User talk:Adrienne of Oxford

Oxford Charter Township, Michigan
Please do not blindly revert this page. First, the claim you made in the edit summary : none of the internal links were bad; I checked all of them is either untrue, or you have a faulty understanding of what a bad link is. For example your version has a link to St. Clair County, a disambiguation page, not the county in Michigan. Second, you included numerous low-value links to common terms. See Only make links that are relevant to the context. There is little value to including links to common English words or year-only dates. third, your reversion removed several constructive links, such as to United States Census, 2000 instead census or links to the Thumb and Detroit United Railway, which are clearly more relevant to the context of the article than links to common words like street, building, brick, masonry, construction, family name or links to disambiguation pages like spring, west, or store. older ≠ wiser 18:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pump It Up Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pump It Up Logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pump It Up The Inflatable Party Zone
A tag has been placed on Pump It Up The Inflatable Party Zone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Pump It Up The Inflatable Party Zone was deleted because it did not indicate how it meets (if it does) Wikipedia's standards for notabilty. If you were intending to expand it you can recreate it.  If you do so be careful to indicate how it is notable or it will deleted again.  Jon513 (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pump It Up The Inflatable Party Zone
A tag has been placed on Pump It Up The Inflatable Party Zone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peasantwarrior (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
Instead of creating new articles you may be interested in expanding the article Inflatable structure. If you need any help, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Jon513 (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I deleted the page because we get a vast amount of spam on Wikipedia, and accordingly to deal with it we have a speedy deletion guidline that allows for deletion of, among other things, non-notable company articles. An article should be in a state that it provides assertion of notability (see WP:N and WP:CORP) when it is created. If you want, and have looked over the policies I have cited, as well as the need for WP:RS, then I am willing to undelete it for you but I would like to see some evidence it satisfies notability guidlines; I'm sorry but they have to be stringent as otherwise we would be flooded with articles no-one will ever require. I am sorry about the misunderstanding, but please be aware of why these procedures are in place. Finally, please try and find it in you to stay, as while it is confusing to begin with once you begin to get a feel for the policies I'm sure you will enjoy it much more. Regards, Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 20:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Gunamudian David Boaz, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 16:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)