User talk:Adrummond67

Discretionary sanctions and 1RR notification
In addition the Michelle O'Neill‎ article, and similar articles, are subject to a 1-revert-rule restriction, meaning no more than one revert in a 24 hour period. In addition your edit was against the consensus at Talk:Martin McGuinness/Archive 2, since Elizabeth Windsor has absolutely nothing to do with the Northern Ireland Assembly - you will not find any mention of her in the relevant legislation. FDW777 (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * For the avoidance of any doubt, while The Troubles may be about a specific period of history, when referring to discretionary sanctions and 1-revert-rule it takes on a wider meaning - "All pages related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland". So your current edits very much are covered by the term "The Troubles". I suggest you stop edit-warring and start discussing your edits on the talk page of the relevant article(s). FDW777 (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to W. T. Cosgrave, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FDW777. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Colm Murphy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please see MOS:TERRORIST, thank you. FDW777 (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement notification
There is a discussion regarding your conduct at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. 19:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement block
To enforce an arbitration decision and for repeated disruption, following the discussion at WP:AE, see ., you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Ymblanter (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."