User talk:Adsderrick

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Augustine


The article Michael Augustine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Can't find any sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falcon8765 (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YCUHWF


A tag has been placed on YCUHWF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... disco spinster   talk  05:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Adsderrick, if you are still around, please visit your talkpage on Commons soon. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Derrick Augustin


A tag has been placed on Derrick Augustin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shirt58 (talk) 04:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jon Hansen, C.Ss.R.


A tag has been placed on Jon Hansen, C.Ss.R., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.cccb.ca/site/eng/media-room/4853-appointment-of-new-bishop-for-mackenzie-fort-smith. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Lumen Monteiro
Hi @Adsderrick. I am @Archer1234. I appreciate your to Lumen Monteiro, but you have added claims without citing any reliable sources to verify them. Verifiability is one of the core content policies of Wikipedia. I presume you have some source(s) from which you are getting the information you added. Are those sources available online? I looked at the Diocese of Agartala website, which confirms much of the data that was already in the article, but I was not able to find anything to verify the new claims your edits added.

You also removed a citation needed maintenance tag without providing the requested citation or without providing a valid reason for its removal. Although I did see that you attempted to cite "https://www.agartaladiocese.org/news_details?news=25" to verify his post as Chairman of CBCI Health Commission. That is fine, but the other claims need citations, too.

Also, note that per MOS:CREDENTIAL, we generally do not use titles or pre-nominals like "Bishop" or "Archbishop" except for some narrow exceptions that do not apply for the uses added in those edits, especially in a space-constrained element like an infobox.

The gallery update is fine, so I have no issue with that, but the rest needs to be removed unless you can cite reliable source(s) to verify those claims. Will you take care of that or would you like me to revert those edits?

If you have any question, you can ask me here or on my talk page. Alternatively, you can ask at the Help desk or at the Teahouse where experienced editors are available to answer questions. Thank you. &mdash; Archer1234  (t·c) 04:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Adsderrick, I have not seen a reply, so I have gone ahead and made updates. Where I was able to find sources, I cited them. Where I was not, I removed the additional claims. If you want to restore any of the unsourced claims, you must cite reliable sources to verify them. Thank you and happy editing. &mdash;  Archer1234  (t·c) 06:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)