User talk:Adulthumanfemale56

January 2021
Funcrunch (talk) 05:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Transgender people in sports. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Stop doing this. You are breaking the link. And read WP:EW. Discuss your changes on the article's talk page per WP:BRD or you may be blocked for edit warring.'' Meters (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Dishonest edit summaries
I am not going to take any action right now, as you are already on final warning, but I just want to let you know that your behaviour has not gone unnoticed. You have used deceptive edit summaries such as "Fixed typo" and "Fixed scientific error" to attempt to conceal your bad edits which were neither fixing typos nor correcting scientific information. The fact that you did this shows that you were fully aware that what you were doing was wrong and were editing in intentional bad faith. Please do not take us for fools. We are not fools. This sort of thing does get noticed. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)