User talk:Advocate BG

December 2015
Wikipedia is not for advocacy, mr Advocate. If you edit Murder of Anni Dewani against consensus again, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC).

Advocate's edit was not against consensus, mr B.S. And it replaced a lede section which ignores Wikipedia's written standards with one that meets those standards. Advocate, I applaud your efforts to get Wikipedia to abide by their standards. Though Bishonen has admitted elsewhere he doesn't care if the page on Anni Dewani is truthful or not, so don't expect a fair hearing from him.209.52.88.212 (talk) 09:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Alert: Discretionary sanctions for pages regarding living or recently deceased people
Bishonen &#124; talk 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC).

Reeva Steenkamp
Your edits at that article was not improving the article. You need to read through some articles to see how a Wikipedia article is formatted. If you continue to do more of these kind of edits you risk being blocked. As previously warned.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Pay no attention to what BabbaQ says, Advocate. He is an officious pest who continually makes reckless accusations without even so much as reading the edits he's commenting on.209.52.88.212 (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Please don't add anything whatever to a biography of a living or recently dead person without citing a reliable source for the information. Read this policy. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC).