User talk:Advocate Ravinder Gulia

December 2018
Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, BYJU’s, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 16:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to BYJU’s. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Terrible Toess (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at BYJU'S. clickheretogototheuserpageofAggarwala2727 (talk) 14:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Use of Wikipedia for campaigning
Wikipedia is not a medium for campaigning, no matter how strongly you feel your campaign is justified, nor is it a medium for "exposing" people you believe are doing something unacceptable. Also, posting negative statements about any living person without providing reliable sourcing to substantiate those statements is unacceptable, especially in the case of accusations of criminal offences. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * That's right. Read WP:GREATWRONGS; Wikipedia is not a place for righting great wrongs. If you continue down that road, your account will be blocked. Consider this your only warning. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)