User talk:Aebarschall

Rollback
Hi, and thanks for your recent edit to Obesity. While your statement was correct, it was redundant--the additional factors section already mentions eating disorders as a cause. Tlesher 03:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Discharge Lamp
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Discharge Lamp, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Discharge Lamp fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Duplicate page with Discharge lamp, which is correctly capitalised To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Discharge Lamp, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Aebarschall! Thanks for the suggestion over on the thimerosal controversy article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience: And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes:   Ravenswing  10:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC). Best of luck, Aebarschall, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
 * When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
 * Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
 * Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

Unspecified source/license for Image:Mt. Jefferson from first cap NH 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mt. Jefferson from first cap NH 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

multiple infobox templates
You added an extra "infobox" template to a couple of articles about New Hampshire mountains. I have removed them, because they weren't necessary; one is more than sufficient. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of GreySheeters Anonymous
A tag has been placed on GreySheeters Anonymous, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Ravenswing  01:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nakoma, Madison, Wisconsin


The article Nakoma, Madison, Wisconsin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Lacks general notability and is merely one small neighborhood in a metropolitan area. Contains no notable landmarks, historical persons, or other features; ie lack of wikilinks and no pages linking in.

Without this, it does not follow the general urban neighborhood notability precedent across the encyclopedia. No items of note, nor can it assert notability on its own. Moreover, precedent and convention for articles for this city do not include separate articles for neighborhoods.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 06:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Annalisse Mayer


The article Annalisse Mayer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NAUTHOR due to lack of major reviews or other significant coverage in independent, reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  SITH   (talk)   12:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Annalisse Mayer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annalisse Mayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Annalisse Mayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  SITH   (talk)   21:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

"Amasa Wright" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Amasa Wright. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 30 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Amasa Wright for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amasa Wright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amasa Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Useless media file."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I am trying to upload a still from my video, but the interface won't let me. They don't believe I took the photo, because it's a still from my video, I guess.  Weird. Aebarschall (talk) 05:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Here's the new link Randolph NH from Dome Rock.png Is this better.  Unfortunately, the trees have grown up in this more recent photo, so the view isn't as good. The new photo is from 2020, while the older one is from 2008, when cell phones didn't have as good of cameras Aebarschall (talk) 05:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Photo of Randolph
I was able to capture an excellent photo of Randolph from one of your videos, however, I cannot upload the photo to Wikipedia because your video is copyright-protected. I am not familiar with Instagram, however, if you are able to indicate on the video that it is without copyright (a "creative commons" license), then I can upload the image. Another option is to upload the video to the Commons. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I did manage to create a screen shot at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aebarschall?markasread=259818929&markasreadwiki=enwiki#/media/File:Randolph_NH_from_Dome_Rock.png Does that work? Aebarschall (talk) 15:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It is, unfortunately, in some respects, not as good a photo, as trees have grown up blocking more of the view. Aebarschall (talk) 15:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You want me to upload the entire video? Sorry to be piecemeal about this.  Confusing. Aebarschall (talk) 15:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia apparently does not allow uploading videos, or maybe I have the wrong format. I uploaded one to YouTube with a commons attribution license https://youtube.com/shorts/FPuWIc3tvyo Aebarschall (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't find the license information on the photo. It was uploaded as a "short", which does not give license info. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please tell me how to fix Aebarschall (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Are we talking about the photo, or about the YouTube video? The YouTube video license is on YouTube. I’m not sure how to change the Wikipedia license Aebarschall (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to add a high-quality photo to the Commons, which I was able to "capture" from your YouTube video. Unfortunately, I'm not able to located the licensing information on the YouTube video (it's usually posted below the video).  The video seems to have been uploaded as a "short", which may be the reason. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please tell me how to fix. Aebarschall (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with YouTube. Do you have a Flickr account?  That's a great place to upload files. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It's annoying that YouTube doesn't show the license on shorts, but I also uploaded a still. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aebarschall?markasread=259818929&markasreadwiki=enwiki#/media/File:Randolph_NH_from_Dome_Rock.png Can you use that? Aebarschall (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It's shown above. Unfortunately, the link to the photo just appears to be to this whole dialog.  Frustrating. Aebarschall (talk) 21:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe this link works better https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Randolph_NH_from_Dome_Rock.png So confusing. Aebarschall (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good. May I trim the border? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * yes Aebarschall (talk) 21:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)