User talk:Aeboornazian/sandbox

Hello, I am one of your peer reviewers. What you have written about Nancy's research looks like a great addition to the article and has a good level of detail. I would possibly question the timeline of the research such as what is she doing now versus what she had done in the past and maybe clarify that. The details you plan on adding sound good about the awards, expanding the intro, and her role as an evolutionary biologist. I thought your addition was very well written and did not have any noticeable typos or grammatical errors and had a good amount of links to other relevant articles. Overall, great job.

Abigail Rankin Peer Review
Your article changes are very good. I really agree with expanding the article to include more of her research. The links to pages about microbiota and insects are very good to have, as is the information about Corbiculate bees. I agree with the other reviewer that it would be really great to include a timeline of her research if that information is available. There is a good level of detail in the article, and it flows well, however, make sure all your tenses match up so that the article is all present tense or past tense instead of switching between the two. Looking forward to reading the final article!

Aarankin (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)