User talk:Aegeis

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Ragib 20:34, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

homeopathy
Hi and welcome to wikipedia and homeopathy. It seems like you have been editing a lot of material in the homeopathy page. Please note that the page is tagged with the Neutral Point of View tag. This means that you should consult people in the discussion page before you go making major edits. The page edits you have made are have strong point of view (POV) and so we have reverted your edits. Please join the discussion before making anther major edit, as you do seem to know plenty on homeopathy and can contribute a lot. PhatRita 13:25, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Aegis - I agree with your POV about homeopathy, but feel that your contributions, while factual (from our shared POV) are not well written or persausive. Please try to contribute to the article usefully, rather than persisting with aggressively pushing a POV that will be reverted, no matter what its merit may be -82.33.53.68 23:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Please sign talk page comments
Just a note -- it's conventional here to sign comments on talk pages. It makes it easier for people to follow discussions. On Talk:Homeopathy and elsewhere, you can sign your old comments by marking them at the end with  -- , and you can sign new comments with  --~ . The difference between the two is that the former doesn't add today's date. Thanks! --FOo 06:28, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Homeopathy - please make edits separately
Yo. I've put in more than my two cents on Talk:Homeopathy -- I think you clearly have some useful information to contribute. However, the way you have been contributing it makes it difficult for others to discuss and integrate with your changes.

Please consider making piecemeal changes to specific sections of the article, and including meaningful edit summaries -- rather than simply replacing broad swaths of the existing text. Thank you! --FOo 22:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Aegeis, we seem to be engaging in a revert war. Once again, I ask you to make your edits one paragraph or sentence at a time. Every day people make additions and corrections to the article. When you revert the whole thing back to your old version from a month or two ago, all these contributions are lost. I'm asking you to engage in a dialog about the article content. If we can't settle this in a collegial manner, the issue will have to escalate to Requests for comment and Requests for mediation. --Lee Hunter 20:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Violation of the 3 revert rule
Aegeis -- I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the three revert rule on Homeopathy. Please take this time to cool off, and when the block is expired try to discuss issues under contention instead of edit warring. Thanks. &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 22:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

homeopathy, AGAIN
Aegeis, why do you insist on making such provocative edits continually? This achieves nothing except to push away contributors and readers. Your actions are simply unnecessary and you know it. Please do something a bit more constructive instead of adding petrol to the edit war fire. PhatRita 13:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

3rr again
I've blocked you for WP:3RR on Homeopathy William M. Connolley 17:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC).

Proposed article rewrite project for homeopathy and related articles
Hello, I noticed that you were an active editor in the homeopathy article and I'm leaving you this message asking you to add some input into a proposed article rewrite project I have planned for it and related articles. This means that I will rewrite the article, post a rough draft as a sub page of my username, then when I am done I will gather all major contributors to work on the article from there following specific rules. Anyone who has been in previous disputes concerning this or related articles should be able to come to a compromise if they are reasonable. This project will take several weeks and will probably involve several other articles. Hopefully we can turn homeopathy and related articles into Featured articles or at least Good articles. If you're willing to aid in such a project then please leave a note of support here Talk:Homeopathy and answer these simple questions here Talk:Homeopathy. Thanks.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 02:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)