User talk:AenglscriptEnlight

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

TheRingess (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Accord Correspondent Environmental Technology Zenith


A tag has been placed on Accord Correspondent Environmental Technology Zenith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 12:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Celestial places


A tag has been placed on Category:Celestial places requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RJH (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

New article INSOL International issues
The article INSOL International, which you posted the inital version of, need significant work. I have divided it into proper wiki-sections. But it badly needs information and supporting references from independant reliable sources, which means sources published by organizatiosn with a reputstiuon for proper fact checking, which are not influenced, affiliated with, or controled by the subject, in this canse by INSOL. 12.54.150.178 (talk) 20:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

三葉星雲 Reference 'Wolf/Three'叶星云 In Context of Astronomy
I have deleted this article; it is a machine translation of an article on Chinese Wikipedia, which already exists on English Wikipedia: Trifid Nebula. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

There is no interest in unnecessary bullying, such as over who gets the claim or credit for a bit of knowledge. I have a number of my own websites, with my own '--pedia'. For those interested in information removed from Wikipedia, feel free to send me an inquiry.

If there is that big a problem over 'Yexing Yun' showing up in English in Wikipedia, my inclination to continue with this account is about nil. A basic search query of Yexing Yun has many results using popular search engines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AenglscriptEnlight (talk • contribs)

How about a redirect supplied at this page, sending viewers wanting to read about M20 ( NGC 6514)/ three Yexing Yun or Trifid Nebulato to link evident. The translation is at: M20/Yexing — Preceding unsigned comment added by AenglscriptEnlight (talk • contribs)
 * I don't know what is "Yexing Yun", and Google hits are few. (Is it a transcription of the Chinese name of the nebula?) In any case, nobody wants to force you off Wikipedia. It's just that Wikipedia does not accept duplicate articles - such pages are merged; if they don't contain any material worth merging, and the title is not a plausible search term that could be redirected to the original page, they may be speedily deleted. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 三葉星雲 Reference 'Wolf/Three'叶星云 In Context of Astronomy is obviously not a plausible search term. Apparently, you intended to redirect Yexing Yun to Trifid Nebula; but as I have said, there are few Google hits for the term. (That the phrase appears in Google's machine translation of the page is not by itself evidence of actual use; machine translations are generally poor.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Please come back
Hello, I wanted to let you know that I've nominated Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AenglscriptEnlight/environmental-computer combined technological development for deletion. This is basically because it's a long-untouched draft page in userspace, and we typically delete such pages if they're not immediately ready to become articles. Would you please come back and work on it? If you want to work on it, I'll happily withdraw the deletion request. If you come back and find that it's been deleted, just ask me (leave a note at my talk page) and I'll happily undelete it for you. Nyttend (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Egersis


The article Egersis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This should be in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 02:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Egersis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egersis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Egersis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Commenting on AFDs
Hi, Thanks for commenting on Articles for deletion/Egersis,

Whilst you're obviously allowed to comment it's best not write long paragraphs like this as no one will read it and it'll eventually get hatted or removed entirely,

Editors when commenting on AFDs are expected to basically keep it short & sweet & more importantly to the point,

As I've obviously reverted you - By all means please amend & repost providing it's significantly shorter - If you really feel the long paragraph should be seen I can only recommend posting it on the noms page,

Thanks and Welcome to the 'pedia btw :), – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Issues and Privacy Concerns about Matters Related to Prophets
Hello AenglscriptEnlight,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Issues and Privacy Concerns about Matters Related to Prophets for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Roxy the dog. bark 18:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The page has been moved to User:AenglscriptEnlight/List of Issues and Privacy Concerns about Matters Related to Prophets, in your userspace. As this page deals with perceived editorial issues regarding other Wikipedia articles, it does not belong in the main article space of Wikipedia. However, I have placed it in your userspace so that it will be less likely to be deleted altogether. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lake Zamkaft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lake Zamkaft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lake Zamkaft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  16:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)