User talk:Aeonjoey

Welcome! Only after the truth, was never anything more. Wiki is supposed to be for everyone, it was never my intent to upset you. You just instantly labeled me as a vandal so we didn't get off on a good start. I realized later you made most of the changes so maybe you felt like it was your baby and that is what got you upset. However, it really did look like an ad to me when I first read it. Like someone from corporate, someone for marketing or someone from the school trying to sell it. Even your responses at the beginning seemed to not focus on neutrality but more of protecting the school. The biggest one for me was when you tried to argue that the school was unrelated to what it was doing chain wide. Or a historic landmark legal case that you just seemed to want to poo-poo or shove to the back of the bus. That is what a marketing person would do, play down all the negatives, reword them as minor and go on and on about the positives. The student restaurant was another example. I didn't care if the restaurant was there, its part of the school. However elaborate detail about location, reservations when it is literally at the front door of the school smells like an ad. I don't fault them for wanting to advertise their restaurant, I think its a good thing just not on Wiki.

Basically, your arguments came across as trying to paint the school as a small private art college which is really is not. It is the second largest chain in the country. It's backed by billions of dollars with its own stock market letter (EDMC) and partially controlled by investment banks. It's not the same as a Cal Arts, Art Center or RISD which literally one have one main campus. There is nothing wrong with being a big chain, but is looked like the article was trying to sell the school as something it was not, which I feel was misleading. You cant have national TV adds for AI then claim your a small school and have almost nothing to do with corporate.

I think what is up there now is fair. I will keep an eye on it as I am sure you will too. Hope we have come to an agreement until someone else comes along and then who knows.--HoytMan (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--HoytMan (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not delete information you disagree with, leave that to the Talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoytMan (talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Themindset 02:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Jonny
LOL Grrl! I'll tell wiki she ain't welcome no mo' :) Thanks for the note! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  13:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AiOC_Logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:AiOC_Logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AiOC Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:AiOC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)