User talk:Aequa+aequum

April 2016
Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

I am going to remove, again, the link you've now added twice. You've referred to WP:ELNO, specifically point 11, but fail to include in your quoting it that it is meant to be very limited, to recognized authorities as a minimum standard. With every respect to Madeline Wilson's suffering, she is not a recognized authority. The site is an advocacy blog and has no place in an encyclopedia. If you wish to include this link, please reach consensus on the article's talk page. Best regards, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Enough with the linkspam already, please. This is not the place to promote your blog. Jonathunder (talk) 00:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, you need to be warned about this: Your recent editing history at St. Olaf College shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Adding the same link back a third time within 24 hours will lead to a block. Jonathunder (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)