User talk:Aerenius

January 2020
[content removed - Alex 21 made inappropriate accusations he could not justify, and so the same have been removed]
 * Your edits were perfectly constuctive, and were both suitable and reasonable. The issue of using suceeded v. followed arose in the Season 12 article as well. What you're dealing with is an editor who can't handle being edited and is abusing a template to indimidate you.  I concur that suceeded is wrong in the context and followed is correct.  -- -- Dr. Margi   ✉  01:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * succeed: "To come after; to be subsequent or consequent to; to follow; to pursue." follow: "(in a sequence): succeed". Try again, Doc. -- / Alex /21  02:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Alex 21,

I asked you, on your talk page, to explain why you considered my edits "unconstructive".

You have responded to Dr Margi's comment, but you have not answered my question. I request that you do so.

Merely disagreeing with me does not make my edit "unconstructive" (in the same way that my disagreeing with you does not make your edits "unconstructive"). Bearing that in mind, please either explain why you consider my edits unconstructive, or kindly withdraw that accusation.

Aerenius