User talk:Aerin17/Archive 1

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Aerin17! Your additions to Draft:Averno (universe) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Morgan Bullock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morgan Bullock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Morgan Bullock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Possibly (talk) 02:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Aerin17, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad to see you intend to improve our coverage of women and have already created Morgan Bullock. For this and future biographies, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Checking in
Hey, Aerin! I finally checked back in on Morgan Bullock and was happy to see that it survived its deletion discussion. This means the article is on much stronger footing than it was pre-discussion for a number of reasons I think I mentioned to you or someone else. I believe it's a fine addition to the encyclopedia, especially from a promising (I guess at this point semi-) new editor. With that out of the way, I just came to check in on how things are going here on Wikipedia – through the looking glass, as it were. Also, before you ask, I'm not an AfC reviewer, so no dice, though you're well within your rights to plug your draft for review on your user page.

What I will say as a new page reviewer is that the quality of your sources here is quite good, and I believe together, they could be pretty reasonably argued to establish notability (the NYT article especially bolsters this case). However, as it seems that large portions of the article are uncited, it may be prudent to incorporate a few more reliable, independent sources to cover the uncited portions and/or trim down the article a bit. Primary sources could likewise be used for uncontroversial statements to fill in some of the gaps, but it's also recommended not to make an article too overly reliant on them. I've listed the three reliable, independent sources I've found below, though be aware that The Stage is paywalled, and I don't have access to it. Hopefully they can be of some use to you, both in contributing to the subject's notability and to sourcing information for the article.


 * https://www.playbill.com/article/in-the-news-daniella-de-jesus-wins-new-play-award-2nd-averno-universe-album-released-more


 * https://www.wsav.com/now/18-year-old-savannah-composers-musical-released-on-broadway-records/


 * https://www.thestage.co.uk/opinion/opinion/creatives-driven-online-are-democratising-musical-theatre-in-unexpected-ways

Happy editing; cheers!  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  08:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * , thank you so much for checking in and for your help! I've added some more citations to the article, though I fear I may need to cut or combine some of the sections that remain unsourced, since I doubt there are any other independent sources out there that mention several of the specific topics. Aerin17 (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Assistance with KPS Capital Partners
Hi! I saw how much you helped EG2021 (my former colleague at Prosek) with edit requests and I was hoping that you might be able to do so for the KPS Capital Partners Wikipedia article as well. I've put my requested changes at the talk page and I'm reaching out to you to see if you would take a look at my edit requests, and get involved in the process. I appreciate any assistance! Morganprosek (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to take a look at the article! I don't want to develop a reputation as The Person Who Helps Prosek People With Edit Requests, though, so hopefully this does not become a long-standing thing. Aerin17 (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for your help with the KPS Capital Partners page! I fully understand that you don't want to be that person who only helps Prosek people - and I really appreciate what you've done for the page. I did have two more parts of my edit request on the talk page if you have the time to glance at them. They included number 3 in my talk page edit request and the request to split the Operations section into History and Operations in a way that makes the most sense. Thanks for any further energy you have for Prosek people! Morganprosek (talk) 22:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

ligature (grammar)
Hi. This is not a duplicate, and I can't contest the speedy because there is none. I realize it's an unref'd stub, but it's a placeholder for eventual expansion, hopefully, and at least links to articles where we have some info on the topic. — kwami (talk) 00:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I apologize about that! It was definitely a mistake on my part for immediately assuming it was a duplicate before looking too much more deeply... though you can understand my confusion as all I find when Googling "ligature" is the other one :) Aerin17 (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Averno (universe) has been accepted
 Averno (universe), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Averno_(universe) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of archers at the 2020 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ana Vázquez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manon Claeys has been accepted
 Manon Claeys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Manon_Claeys help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 23:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Days of the year
Hey Aerin17,

Thanks for the good work adding missing citations to January 26‎. Cleaning up those articles is the main focus of WikiProject Days of the year these days. Please consider joining the project. We could use your help!

Here's the (long) backstory:

A few years ago, some of us noticed that the Days of Years (DOTY) pages were becoming a complete mess with incorrect and unverifiable info.

The DOTY project had exempted themselves from verifiability. (yes, really) As a result, almost none of the pages had any sources to back things up, based on the naive (and against Wikipedia policy) belief that all entries would be backed by reliable sources in the linked article. It turns out that was not the case and the DOTY pages were filled with incorrect info and even worse, other places started believing the info there and publishing the incorrect info in newspapers, for example on "Today's date in history" type listings.

So about two years ago the DOTY project took the bold step of requiring that all new entries be backed by direct reliable sources. Several of us have gone through and started cleaning things up. May 11 is an example of where we want to be. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page.

We could use your help in:
 * 1) Preventing new entries that don't include direct sources and when they occur, either supplement them with a reliable source or reverting them.
 * 2) Helping us clean up articles. The project members have asked all participants to go through their birthday and clean the entries up by adding reliable sources to each entry, or removing entries where reliable sources aren't readily available.  Some of us have done that and a few more days.

Anyway, please consider joining us. Toddst1 (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reaching out! I actually came across the DOTY WikiProject through the Signpost report, which is what got me started on January 26. I was thinking about joining once I'd done enough editing to see if I enjoyed it (I did), and have now done so! Now to just keep working through January 26... Aerin17 (t • c) 01:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Please consider adding your name to the list at WikiProject_Days_of_the_year and adding User WikiProject Days of the year to your userpage.  Cheers!  Toddst1 (talk) 01:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)