User talk:Aestrada093

Welcome!
Hello, Aestrada093, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Article Vetting
Here are my thoughts on your potential articles, Ana:

Animal Crossing - This appears to be mostly a hub article, so it seems like it would be hard to determine what belongs here and what fits better in the main page. Possibly you could expand on the history of the franchise, but not sure.

Animal Crossing: New Leaf - It seems like they need more sources, but this could also be challenging.

Fish Migration - This article seems like it's stalled due to research, so it could be a good fit.

Little Nightmares - This seems like a great fit because of significant content gaps.

One Piece (TV series) - This could work really well, because there are so many huge charts and tables, and not much in the way of content. On a completely irrelevant note, I love the One Piece manga (as you probably guessed by my handle).

One Piece (Stampede) - This one could work also, because some of it appears to be written as an essay, and there are other huge charts/tables.

Miami Dolphins - This could work well because there are sections that need expansion, but the editing page seems active, so be prepared to engage with other editors.

Overall: I recommend going with Little Nightmares and one of the One Piece articles. Happy to chat about any of these further if you like. Spike Mugiwara (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

articles that I have chosen
I want to work on little nightmares and one piece, the tv series.

Bullet Points
Social Experiment -could be controversial -no images or charts to support the claim -more reliable sources

Sin -could be controversial -only includes well-known religions

Comprehensive Assessment of your Articles
Little Nightmares: The audience for this paper is those who have played the game. You pay the game with no background information. You only pick up information from your surroundings. This Wikipedia meets the expectations of what most people would come looking for. Those that are interested in communicating on the page are the many theories that arise from the game bein so vague. The only level of expertise is to play the game and try to make connections. The editing of this article evolved very slowly. It has not been tagged at all. The launch trailer for the video game has been nominated for deletion. On the talk page, little nightmares have been ranked as a start class on both video games and horror wikiprojects. It has also been ranked low importance for both categories. For the video game wikiproject, the template involves background, the time it released, reviews, a list of video game titles, and then external links. The guidelines for the videogames wikiproject are basically similar to that of Wikipedia the only difference would be the layout in which they have several different ones depending on the subject you are working on. The appropriate content for video games would be essential content, release dates, categorizing upcoming games. Inappropriate content would be detailed instructions, strategy guides and walkthroughs so name a few. A few articles listed are the Legend of Zelda and Pokemon Fire Red and Leaf Green. They have similar layouts to that of Little Nightmares. Challenges that I see myself having to overcome are finding factual information since a lot of these stories are fictional. The layout of the anime wikiproject is to include plot, characters, production, themes, media, reception, and categorization. Most under this wikiproject shows a similar layout to that of One Piece. The audience of this article is those who want to learn the basics of the show or those who know about the show and want to figure out or clarify some information. The purpose of this article is to do just that. Challenges I face when working on this article is having too much information that I believe would be important when in reality it is unnecessary.

To do list: TBD

One Piece: Those who are interested in this article are fans of the show One Piece. People would come to this article to look at specific arcs, voice actors, OVAs. It really doesn't specifically tell you what the show is specifically by arcs, but it does redirect to those specific arcs. The article. The contributors are kind of tied into those who are interested in the one-piece fandom. There is so much information on this topic alone and many subtopics. You would have to understand the knowledge in the show and concepts they introduce in the show. The level of expertise made it have so many reliable sources. The editing in this article grew quite slowly and has grown. Mostly a handful of people are very active in this article. There are many disagreements on what changes are made. Most are details added as more information is released as well as deletion of unnecessary information. The article has no tags. Not many controversies between the people on the talk page. This article is placed in the Anime wikiproject.

To do list: TBDAestrada093 (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Main Issue #1: Organization and Lead
One Piece (TV Series) •	The layout to One Piece (TV Series) compared to other articles in the Anime WikiProject, is very similar. There are some gaps that could be filled as the information is available. My reasoning for comparing the articles to that of the Anime WikiProjects is because it is marked as high importance in that category. •	The organization flow is not too bad. I would change the order of other films listed, besides the TV series. •	Information I believe to be out of place is voice actors. It is the smallest section, and the placement of it looks odd. •	Again, the voice actors’ section is too short. I don’t know if maybe adding a bit of information about the actors would be wise. •	The lead section provides enough information, but I think adding more about his crewmates is essential as well to the story. I don’t believe any information should be moved to the lead section. •	Digging a bit deeper into the section I believe that other films for One Piece should be reordered. Other than that, every section is ordered well as well in paragraphs.

Little Nightmares •	The layout of this article is very similar to those that are featured in the Video Game WikiProject. There are a few gaps that could be filled in. •	No majoring reconstructing in needed. The flow of the article goes from the chronological order of what is most important. •	Everything is in order in this article. Everything is also given emphasis. •	There are a few sections that are quite small compared to other sections. One of them is supposed to be a section of part of the game. This separation could’ve been done better. The other small sections aren’t that important to the article. These sections cannot really be expanded much as they have not been released. Comic books is a section that could be expanded more. •	The lead section seems to be missing important information. A small synopsis could be added to the lead section. The information in the Lead could be brought down to later sections. •	The information is in the most logical order as well as within each paragraph. Aestrada093 (talk) 05:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Major Issue #2: Content-focus Problems
One Piece Article In this wiki article, I felt that maybe music was out of place. It is somewhat relevant since the opening of the show involves music and the ending as well, but I wasn’t sure they would include it. From what I gathered there were no biases within the article. I don’t understand this question, is it like that of being biased? None of the articles seems like original research. Claims are supported with citations, but there is room for additions. I cannot really pinpoint where exactly these citations are needed. Most citations are reliable within the article and there seem to be no biases. If they were, they aren’t listed. Many citations need verification. Many citation verifications are needed. The intro needs more information as well as the voice actors.

Little Nightmares: Everything seems relevant in the article, and nothing seems out of place. The article is neutral, and a few citations look biased. I still don’t know what this means. From the lack of citations, there could be an issue with original research. I know for sure more cited work is needed. With those that are cited, they do seem to be a support. There are many places where citations should be included. Not every fact has a citation, and those that do some are reliable while some seemed like they are biased. These biased citations are from review pages of the game. Not much information is missing from this article about the game, and a few things are out of date. 65.127.93.161 (talk) 04:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)