User talk:Aeternus/Archive Pt. 4

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Aeternus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Simon Augustini -

Jose Aranda
Hello, I see you replaced a CSD tag on an article. We do not do this. The article is sourced, asserts significance, and is not promotional. Not sure it would pass WP:AFD, but that would likely be the best place to sift matters. Dloh cierekim  00:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I have sent this to Articles for deletion/Jose Aranda. Dloh cierekim  01:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Entered your name in Albanian TF.
Hi! I noted that you have created Çiftelia, and I entered your name here. I hope you don't mind it! Please let me know if you won't me to revert myself. Mireseerdhe! --Special:Contributions/Sulmues ʨ  (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem, its just that I rarely contribute on Albanian-related stuff. --Λeternus (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Pse je ftohur me projektin Shqiptar? Ndonje aresye e vecante? Kam pare qe ke qene ketu qe para 4-5 vjetesh dhe ke dhene shume. Si eshte e mundur qe tani nuk interesohesh me? -- Sulmues talk   15:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Tani kontributi im kryesorë në lidhje me shqiptarët gjendet në Wikipedian shqip. Atje shkruaj/përkthej artikuj për audiencën shqiptare. --Λeternus (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

From TF to Wikiproject
You might want to see this and give your opinion. Thank you for your contributions to the Albania Wikiproject! --sulmues talk contributions 11:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Eurasian Island
Hi

Strangely enough that is one term that we normally say "a Eurasian" rather than "an Eurasian" (Cyprus edits):

A Eurasian (Google = About 3,580,000 results (0.62 seconds)) An Eurasian (Google = About 2,400,000 results (0.31 seconds))

As for the correct term I am unclear as whether it should be written as spoken or whether it should be as is after your edit

Chaosdruid (talk) 07:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

The Eurasian patent office has it on their title page as "a Eurasian" but then go on to call themselves an organization lol Chaosdruid (talk) 07:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Project
You may want to review this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albania. Take care. --  S ulmues (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Simon Augustini
Hello, Aeternus. I've just come across this article, which you created a couple of years ago. It still needs references, but I know nothing about him - can you help? Markiewp (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It's original research. --Λeternus (talk) 22:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah, well he seems clearly notable from what's in the article. If you come across anything from a reliable source, then add it and I'll see if I can find anything. Markiewp (talk) 08:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. --Λeternus (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bono on Bono.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bono on Bono.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simon Augustini


The article Simon Augustini has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP (since 2008); I can't find any independent reliable sources to verify the information in this article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Sociology membership
You are listed in the Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology, probably due to the use of "This user is interested in sociology" userbox, but you have not added yourself to our official member list for WikiProject Sociology. This prevent you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter here). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 12:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

ten
http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prishtina spread the word! James Michael DuPont (talk) 05:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Aron Magner
I saw that you had edited Livetronica and was hoping you'd be interested in checking out Aron Magner. It has a COI tag on it and it would be nice to get some neutral eyes looking at it. Cloveapple (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello
Hey Aeternus, I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Aura (The Alpha Conspiracy album) in the New Articles list-- The reference looks great. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines. I'm kind of new here myself but let me know if there is any way I can help. Thanks, Jipinghe (talk) 19:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I think I fixed it, but please check it again to make sure everything is ok. --Λeternus (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Behind (album)


The article Behind (album) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable album per WP:NALBUMS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 01:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ultima Ratio (album)


The article Ultima Ratio (album) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable album per WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Periphery
Hi Aeternus, I noticed your changes in the genre of Periphery. I don't know Periphery at all, so it's hard for me to decide which genres should be added, but do you have any source for this? Past weeks I reverted some genre changes made by unregistered users, for know I assume good faith on your part, but it could help the article if we can find some good sources, limit the genres and keep it that way. Allmusic has a very different opinion on this bands genre, but as far as I'm concerned Allmusic isn't omniscient. Thanks, Quibus (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * It seems there isn't any reliable source that backs up my edit. So you can revert it. --Λeternus (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * You're a sport, thanks! Quibus (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:NaveneK.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NaveneK.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Diffusion Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diffusion Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diffusion Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Albacore (talk) 15:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Diffusion Records.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Diffusion Records.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

CAB (band)
Whoopsies, my mistake! I totally forgot about Donati on the latest album. Might you have any suggestions for sources that could be added to thicken the article up a little? It's quite sparse at the moment, and I don't actually know much about the band despite having heard their entire studio discography. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Krav maga
Whathehell? For you to know vandalism is a destroying something unreasonably.

Hagahan was paramilitary org (check its page) & it's target was to protect a newcomers to Palestine.

If you don't like it's only your problem


 * The problem was with the tone you used in the second part of the sentence. --Λeternus (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

There was no tone at all as they really used to protect themselfs from Palestinians & and that was hagahan for. Am I wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.149.21.153 (talk) 07:33, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * In an encyclopedia, you don't refer to Jewish people as "Jews". This led me to believe that your whole edit was a vandalism. --Λeternus (talk) 07:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Then you were too prejudice and intolerant that didn't let you to read the edit more thoughtful & mislead with your conclusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.149.21.153 (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Based on my experience on Wikipedia, most of the edits that contain derogatory terms appear to be vandalism. I'm sorry I didn't analyse your edit more carefully, but as I stated earlier, your tone led me to make my incorrect presumption. Please be more careful about the tone you choose when you edit the next time. Thanks. --Λeternus (talk) 08:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm also sorry as I hoped to meet a Homo Sapiens that should analyze first & correct the tone if necessary to be more neutral but not in a time to vandalize by emotional impulse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.149.21.153 (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, with edits like these, you obviously make yourself look like a troll. I explained myself to you, and have nothing more to say. --Λeternus (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hope your politeness will be found some day. The end.--83.149.21.153 (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Dream Theater sideprojects
Category:Dream Theater sideprojects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MarkBrydon.png
Thanks for uploading File:MarkBrydon.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Steven Pinker
With your last revert you breached the {WP:3RR|3 revert rule]] for editwarring. I think you should go back and selfrevert, since breaking the 3 revert rule may lead to being blocked.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 21:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * See how it is much easier to convince people that an edit makes sense through discussion and argumentation than through editwarring. This is obviously an important argument in Music cognition and apparently virtually everyone who is an actual expert disagrees with Pinker. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, and for contributing to improving the article. As an aside the article on Music cognition seems in a bad state, it is entirely about the effects of personality and mood on musical preferences (which is in fact rather psychology than cognition). Nothing about the neurological or cognitive substrate of musical behavior.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 22:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * So far, cognitive neuroscience of music article contains the best information about the neurological and cognitive substrates of music perception and behavior. --Λeternus (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Your recent editing history at Steven Pinker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, I see that you've been told above that you've breached 3RR. As you don't seem to have been warned in the past about 3RR I won't block, but please understand that you can't just wait 24 hours and repeat the same cycle. 3RR is not a right. Get consensus for this now please. Dougweller (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Swedish House Mafia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rvir0522 (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I only removed "occupation" parameter from the template, as it is used for individual musicians only. Are you sure you are referring to my edit? --Λeternus (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I see, you can disregard the last warning then. --Rvir0522 (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vibrato (Paul Gilbert album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brubeck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Unbelievers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Morrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominici


The article Dominici has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:NBAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject U2 (April 2013)
You are receving this because your username is listed in Category:WikiProject U2 members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Cheers. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 10:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Test for Wikiproject U2
Test message for Wikiproject U2 to see if the membership list runs properly. Sent by Pjoef to Miss Bono and Pjoef only. 13:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my fault. The bot does not recognize the  TAG and this message has been sent to all the inactive users of Wikiproject U2. Remove this section whenever you want. Sorry once again. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 14:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem :) --Λeternus (talk) 14:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Continuum (Instrument) request
I saw that you had edited the Continuum (instrument) page in the past. I build the Continuum, and have information I think should be listed on the page -- I have waited for years, but nobody listed it. As I understand Wikipedia ethics, I am not supposed to edit the page -- so I added a request for someone to add the information on the Continuum (instrument) talk page. Unfortunately, the "page visits" counter tells me that the talk page does not get visited by anyone (except me). It would be wonderful if you could take a look at the Continuum (instrument) talk page, and either add the information (if you think its a good idea), or tell me what I should do next? thanks a lot, Lippold

PS: I will check back here to see if you write anything here; I will check the Talk page on the Continuum (instrument) page as well. If you like you can also email me Lippold@HakenAudio.com50.179.49.252 (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Lippold


 * Hi, I just added the information you provided to the Continuum page. Thank you. Your effort to stay out of conflict of interest is valuable. Also, read WP:CONFLICT too see how can you can further contribute to this article without violating the Wikipedia policies. Thanks again, --Λeternus (talk) 09:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for updating the article and for the info on Wikipedia policies! -Lippold 50.179.49.252 (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Aeternus.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you. This is my first barnstar :) --Λeternus (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gjakova (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Enterprises, Craftsmanship, Hamam and Ottoman


 * Kosovska Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Roman, John Evans and Ibar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Vučitrn
I would suggest at some point a new WP:RM. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fleshwrought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Gothic architecture
I noticed your addition of this tag.

You have given no examples of the "Peacock" language to which you are referring. I can only guess. In the article, there is no "proclamation about the subject's importance", beyond the facts represented here:
 *  A great number of ecclesiastical buildings remain from this period, of which even the smallest are often structures of architectural distinction while many of the larger churches are considered priceless works of art and are listed with UNESCO as World Heritage Sites.

These facts are true beyond doubt. Let me explain it.
 * A small church built in 1960 is likely to be of no architectural distinction whatsoever. By contrast, a church of the same size built in 1360 is likely to have a fine wooden roof, mouldings around its pointed-arched doors and windows, small stone carvings and ornamental fittings even if it is only a small, plain church. All this adds up to having "architectural distinction".
 * "Many of the larger churches are considered priceless works of art": e.g. Notre Dame, Paris;  Chartres Cathedral, St Denis Basilica,  Milan Cathedral, Florence Cathedral, Salisbury Cathedral, Wells Cathedral, Canterbury Cathedral, Lincoln Cathedral, York Minster, Reims Cathedral, Beauvais Cathedral,  Cologne Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, Ulm Minster, Amiens Cathedral, Laon Cathedral, Leon Cathedral, Rouen Cathedral etc etc etc.  Many, if not all, of these buildings are World Heritage Sites. Why? Because they are considered priceless works of art.
 * The statement that they are "considered priceless works of art" is supported by the fact that they have World Heritage Listing.
 * The words "priceless works of art" has been used here (deliberately) rather than "priceless works of architecture" because each large church represents more than just a building. At some Gothic Churches (Chester Cathedral for example) it is the internal fittings that are the most significant feature. At the church of St Mary, Fairford, it is the stained glass that makes the building significant. At another church it might be the tombs, or the statues, or the painted ceiling.

I can assure you that when writing about architecture of this type, using terms like "considered priceless works of art" (with World Heritage Listings) is no different to citing a particular drummer, guitarist or keyboard player as considered by a particular magazine to be "one of the greatest" or even "the greatest of all time".

If this hasn't answered your questions about the language, then please get back to me. Amandajm (talk) 03:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Livetronica music groups


A tag has been placed on Category:Livetronica music groups, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Semitransgenic talk. 11:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Livetronica music groups
Category:Livetronica music groups, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 11:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you :) --Λeternus (talk) 08:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

p.s. I finally took the time to study the history page and learned how to navigate through revisions, et cetera. Last but not least, I clicked on the many "Thanks" buttons that I owed to you. Thanks again. I'll hopefully post a rewrite of the 'Cognitive biology' 'History' section before too many weeks fly past. Jakelove (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Jan Linton
This was deleted as an expired PROD, has been restored after an objection. You may want to consider WP:AfD. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

about your proposed deletion process (Helena Karel)
Hello to you ! About Helena Karel, i've added informations to try to be the closest possible with WP:PORNBIO. Could you check please and let me know if it's ok for you, or not ? Thank you. Sg7438 (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * According to this info, she appears to meet criterion #3 of WP:PORNBIO, so I removed my deletion proposal accordingly. However, Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, secondary sources, and to a lesser extend on primary sources. Currently, the article about Helena Karel is based mostly on information from her website (primary source), failing to meet WP:V. We need direct links from the online magazines (or page numbers, if printed) so we can confirm that the info on her site stands. --Λeternus (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Great... I agree it's the first stape. And her awards are ok, no ? I'll search for external sources, i know we only have primary sources. You gave me a little time, i'll now work for the rest. HAve a good day ! Sg7438 (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello ! After you added new element to improve, i've added a media section (criteria asked in WP:Pornbio) but it has been deleted... I don't undestand why ! (i made like in Clara Morgane's page, where the section is present...) I've added external sources and reliable sources (we now have just one primary source). I've added external link about Bob Sinclar and Petter Hegre but i'm afraid it is a little too erotic (please let me know). About "notability guideline for biographies" you added yesterday, i don't have ideas : this is not a biography, just a page about an actress... I still have to work about that orphan page. I had added her there it was the 24th may 2014. Someone has all erased. I'll try to had her there but i'm not sure, otherwise i'll make a specific page (List of french porn actresses) : tell me please if it's a good idea. Have a nice day and i hope i don't disturb you (sorry for my english ) Sg7438 (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Dismas, as he carefully explained on his talk page, removed the information you added because it made the article look like a personal resume (see WP:RESUME). It looked like a resume because it listed every magazine she has appeared on. It's true that this information made me remove my deletion proposal, but that doesn't necessarily mean it can all go to the article; a note on the talk page would have been fine too. Clara Morgane's article lists only the main magazines she has appeared on (although her article is in a very bad state, and we should't take it as an example). You have added two secondary sources (which I'm not sure are reliable) but the article still needs a lot more. The reason I added the last tag about notability is obvious: the current sources aren't enough to establish her notability, and an article about a person is a biography, so I don't see a problem with it. The essence of the tag is to show that the subject of the article may not be notable. As per List of pornographic actresses by decade, I think user:Gene93k (user:SqueakBox,, sorry) has removed all unsourced entries from it, where Helena Karel was one of them (see Talk:List of pornographic actresses by decade). --Λeternus (talk) 10:26, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree that the Clara Morgane article should not be used as a good example. Right now it only has a single reference and reads more like a collection of tidbits rather than a biography.  Also, I'd like to take a moment to point out that while Karel is listed in many databases (Adult Film Database, etc.) that doesn't make her notable.  Somebody taking the time to write about her in an article, such as in a magazine or news web site, would make her notable.  The databases simply confirm that she is a model/actress.  Dismas |(talk) 10:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the answer : i was not comparing pages (Clara Morgane v. Helena Karel)... I had to proove the notability (medias criteria, so i look on Clara Morgane's page to answer to wp:pornbio 3 reacting to the deletion process. But the problem is that it is considered not usefull (so how can i proove that HK is notable ?) and deleted. I'm not in a hurry, i just try to have an acceptable page... Let me know please when you can ! Sg7438 (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You can prove HK is notable by providing secondary sources. --Λeternus (talk) 07:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Holly Weber Article
Hi there! I appreciate the hard work you're putting into the Holly Weber article. I am, however, concerned by the plea for privacy and the admission of a suicide attempt on the bio that you link to - http://goholly.com/biography.html# - which also appears to indicate that she's retired from all these professions. Does that concern you at all? AdventurousMe (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, she has deliberately posted this information on her own website, and it's the most visible information there (it's the first thing that pops when you open it). I tried to minimize it all by providing only a single short sentence to her article. I'm not really sure what to do. Maybe address the issue into her talk page? --Λeternus (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Maybe make clear that she's retired within the article? I agree it's appropriate to minimise that info, rather than leave it out. AdventurousMe (talk) 01:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I now think that the sentence "She also worked as an escort" is quite ok because it tells the reader that she did work as an escort in the past. --Λeternus (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Deprod * 2
I have removed the prod tag from The Judges (demogroup), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Frodet (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC) I have removed the prod tag from The Lords (demogroup), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Frodet (talk) 13:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC)