User talk:Aetnomeleci5566

Welcome!
Hello, Aetnomeleci5566, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:PropertyLimBrothers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Equine-man (talk) 09:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:PropertyLimBrothers


A tag has been placed on Draft:PropertyLimBrothers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Equine-man (talk) 09:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Can i retrieve back my deleted draft? Or can the title of the wiki be unlock? Aetnomeleci5566 (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello Aetnomeleci5566. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aetnomeleci5566. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Have provided the disclosure. I am not directly paid for this. Aetnomeleci5566 (talk) 09:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Employment is sufficient to trigger the disclosure, even if you are not specifically paid to edit. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ok.. can i retrieve the page for submission again? Aetnomeleci5566 (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was deleted as blatantly promotional and won't be restored. Furthermore, as there has been repeated efforts to edit about your company unsuccessfully, I have protected the draft from creation by accounts that are not extended confirmed(30 days old with 500 edits). Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves and what they do- a Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not interested in what a company says about itself, or in what its associates say about it- only in what others wholly unconnected with the company choose on their own to say about it.  This cannot include staff interviews, press releases, announcements of routine activities like the raising of capital or commencement of operations, brief mentions, or other primary sources.
 * If you have been asked by your superiors to create this draft, you will need to tell them that they have given you an impossible task. Feel free to show them this message. If you have independent reliable sources that meet the criteria I have spelled out here, and can write dispassionatly with a neutral point of view, setting aside what you know about the company, please tell what your three best independent reliable sources are. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)