User talk:Aevans18732

March 2021
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I noticed that you recently removed content from Helena Bonham Carter without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Helena Bonham Carter. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  —  csc -1 03:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Maybe if you would just leave my edit alone I wouldn’t have to keep reverting it. Dunno why you nerds are so anal about it? Aevans18732 (talk) 03:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

I DID explain why, but you obviously have not understood why. Aevans18732 (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Stop changing my edits, why do you get there so quickly BOT? Aevans18732 (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)