User talk:Aevensen

Hi all,

I am a volunteer editor, but am occasionally paid to fix pages with issues as part of a marketing package I sell.

I have been paid to create the following pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kurt_Iswarienko https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClicData https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UpShow

I have volunteered to create the following pages without pay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CaraNua https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Knudson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Tonioli

Any other pages I've created have been random/unrelated contributions. I occasionally take article jobs via Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/fl/alexandriaevensen2

Speedy deletion nomination of Landry Simmons


A tag has been placed on Landry Simmons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kurt Iswarienko
Hi Aevensen. I've moved the article back to draft space once again, because it still has fundamental problems. I'm asking for help, as I don't know what to do next here. --Ronz (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Rawson


A tag has been placed on Glenn Rawson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Toddst1 (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of UpShow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UpShow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UpShow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 10:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * You are blocked for violating the conflict of interest guideline, tendentiously moving paid-for spam into mainspace and abusing Wikipedia to promote your clients. MER-C 17:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

MER-CBut I can't fix it? I can simply never edit on Wikipedia again? Aevensen 17:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * RE: "I'm still learning the ropes". I seem to see this a lot with SPI and and promo (UPE) editing unblock requests. "Information purposes" is definitely a catchphrase user by those here to promote their COI interests. Best way you know how? List each and every subject you are being paid to edit about and who is doing so. Read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. You will need to place a notice on each and every related talk page. You will not move any page out of "Drafts" into article space. There's more, but this is off the top of my head.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This user also has a CU-confirmed sock account: User:Hellydolly4893 (blocked). Yunshui 雲 水 20:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)