User talk:Afaprof01/Archives/2012/September/3

Bride of Christ—questions
I was going through the history of the entry on the Bride of Christ and found you were the one who "removed unsourced material" on Dec. 26, 2009. Have you considered that the most important secondary sources on this subject date to the first centuries and these sources are very hard to access if at all (mostly by historians and theologians)? And that anything written today is done by people who have little knowledge of the subject? In a situation like this the primary source—in this case the Bible—is the most important and accessible source. I would like to discuss this further with you. (note: I don't have a computor at home and will be online again on Mon. 7.30--Margaret9mary (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear Margaret9mary. I apologize for not responding promptly to your very polite question regarding the "Bride of Christ" article. Today is the first time I have checked my "mail" since you wrote me. Since it's been 3 years, I have no present recollection. However, evaluating it today, I consider the following to be unsourced, and I removed them 3 years ago:
 * "Cyprian of Carthage, De Ecclesiae Catholicae Unitate, 4-6"

These are vague and there is no way the reader can refer back to them based on this scanty information.


 * "Examples are Anne Catherine Emmerich, Joanna Southcott, Gertrude Morgan, Åsa Waldau"

I don't see where I removed any biblical references, but if I did, please include the time/date and I'll be glad to reconsider. I certainly consider cited biblical references legitimate if they are indeed relevant to the topic. Thanks and regards. ─AFA Prof01 (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)