User talk:AfghanBios

Dr. Sayed Noorullah Jalili moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dr. Sayed Noorullah Jalili, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GPL93 (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request in due course, there is no specific timetable, as administrators are volunteers here on their own time. There are no "higher administrators". There is no prejudice involved. I did not comment on the spam/advertising because I didn't think it necessary as it's very clear. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

You didn't write about this person by chance. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

"I would like to say again, 331dot. All of this is circumstantial and you are providing no in-depth reasoning or evidence for your claims. You claim, I am an advertiser and labelled me as spam, but I would like to know what evidence actually points to that. You said I didn't write about this person by chance and it was intentional. To that, I have to say, is intentional writing forbidden in wikipedia? I intended to write on a multitude of Afghan politicians. The fact that you have assumed my stance on writing about this person, is again circumstantial and a complete guess by you without any evidence at all. I will say this for the 3rd time now, I am not paid nor do I have any affiliation to that person and even if I were to have any affiliation, you are not supposed to judge me on that but rather the quality and neutrality of my article. In the article, I did not include any speeches of praise nor did I paint the subject in a light of glory. If there were any issues in neutrality and certain sentences were out of context or irrelevant, you or the other admins could have left a note to change it and moved it out of the live space for me to make the edits and then submit for reviewing, properly. However, deleting it completely? I feel as though that is unfair as per the wikipedia guidelines. I can personally pinpoint multiple pages which violate your "laws" of writing but that is up to you as the esteemed admin.
 * I'm not esteemed, I just have extra buttons. I absolutely believe you that there are other articles that warrant deletion or other action.  As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, and as there are over 6 million articles to manage, inappropriate articles can get by us.  We can only address what we know about. If you would like to help out, you can help us identify other inappropriates articles for possible action.  Since I'm not in the room with you, circumstantial is all I have to go on.  If I am in error, another administrator will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

"No worries, 331dot. I appreciate your review regardless and will await another administrators review as well for a final verdict. I agree that it isn't possible to tell the circumstances unless with me in a room but what you can tell the truth and my intentions from is my writing, which was deleted. My writing will prove whether there was any violation. My main point was that if any issues were present with the article, I should've been left a directive message by the first admin to fix it up and make it neutral but deletion and blocking seemed a little stretched and unnecessary. As you said there are 6 million articles out there, some which feature extremely inappropriate and misleading information but the fact that those articles are still up and mines was deleted after a day on wikipedia, is concerning. I would also like to ask if you have read the article to actually come to a conclusion or whether your judgment was dependent and an extra to the verdict of the first admin. Nevertheless, thank you for your review. Will await further information."
 * I did read it and came to that conclusion myself without considering what the other admin said. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

"331dot, could you please show me which part of the article made you become suspicious of spam/advertising and which part did not abide by wikipedia's guidelines?"

There is no means to delete an account, for both technical and legal reasons. You are free to abandon your account. Once you click "Publish changes", the edit is no longer yours and belongs to Wikipedia, as noted immediately above that button("By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.") You have no "right of free will" on Wikipedia to do as you wish without restriction, limitation, or criticism- that statement only further leads me to believe you aren't writing about this person by chance. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries, thank you. I will abandon the account and prevent myself from ever writing on wikipedia again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfghanBios (talk • contribs)
 * So you are withdrawing your unblock request? 331dot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I have withdrew my unblock request.

Block evasion
This user was caught setting up a sockpuppet account to evade their block and continue spamming, as (now blocked). This should count against any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

I haven't initiated any sock puppet accounts, I am not sure what this means.
 * The account SJYTMAIN has been confirmed by a checkuser to be a sock puppet of this account. If you didn't create that account yourself, it is still meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

I did not initiate any account. Anything that happens to it, I am not liable.
 * You don't have to have initiated the account. Please read WP:MEAT. The other account was blocked by a checkuser, meaning that there is private technical evidence to support it. If you aren't going to request to be unblocked, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)