User talk:Afip05

License tagging for Image:Nagl.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Nagl.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

John nagl
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John nagl, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, John nagl appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. John nagl has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:John nagl. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at John nagl, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Konstable 21:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

"Nagling"
There is a Wikipedia policy: Avoid neologisms. This is all the more critical when use of a neologism cannot be Verified from Reliable Sources as being in widespread usage with that meaning. A Google search for "Nagling" shows that, in fact, there is a very common usage of the word, relating to computer networking and data transmission. It appears that the usage of Nagling to mean "behavior like that of LTC Nagl" is not in widespread usage, and in fact Google and Yahoo search find no instances of it at all in combination with LTC Nagl's name. The reference, unsourced and unverifiable, is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Fan-1967 19:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)