User talk:Afroze.sahib

Hi. I removed your Ceki Gülcü article, and instead set it to redirect to log4j. All the content that was included in the article already existed in the log4j piece, except for the part about his book, which I added to the bottom. If there comes a time when you feel like contributing a longer article on Ceki, don't hesitate to remove the redirect and do so. Thanks for your contributions. --Mblumber (talk) 23:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Rashid Ali
Thanks for all your hard work on Rashid Ali!!! Keep up the Good Work...

P.S : I like your biography... :D..

--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Stentorian voice
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stentorian voice, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-stentorian-voice.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ceki Gülcü


The article Ceki Gülcü has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Ruud 23:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)