User talk:Afuganantik

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Stewman


A tag has been placed on Ryan Stewman, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://hibandigital.com/tag/social-media-marketing/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ryan Stewman


The article Ryan Stewman has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Stewman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Stewman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Stewman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Taylor Cammarata


A tag has been placed on Michael Taylor Cammarata, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 23:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Mandatory paid editing disclosure
Hello Afuganantik. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Afuganantik. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jytdog (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I know Chris, he's a friend. I'm not paid to edit his page. He meets the notability criteria, that's why I decided to help.Afuganantik (talk) 18:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * That doesn't explain the other promotional pages you have created. Please disclose your connections to the subjects about which you have edited. Jytdog (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jytdog, I don't understand you! Other pages I created got deleted. I did'nt worry about them. I already told you my connection with Chris..I've been off wiki for some weeks.. I don't understand what you're doing. Could you explain more? Is wikipedia not open to every one to edit? Are there restrictions? I need to knowAfuganantik (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I won't ask again - please provide a straightforward and full answer. Please be aware that there is a place for paid editors in Wikipedia, but the community will expect you to disclose and follow the COI management process. The process starts with disclosure. So please start. Jytdog (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Chris did not pay me to edit his page. I'm a friend to him. I'm not getting paid for any edits. I edit once in a while. Other pages I also created were not paid for. Some of them got deleted already. Thank uAfuganantik (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Draftified
I have moved the page you created to draft space -- it is now at Draft:Chris J. Young -- pending the discussion above.Jytdog (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You moved that page to mainspace again, which is thwarting our peer review process for conflicted editors. Please don't do that again. Jytdog (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

You moved it back, but you know that the review process takes quite a long time. The truth is that Chris meets the notability requirements. If the article is not neutral, why not neutralize it? I'm getting pissed off with English wiki! What a processAfuganantik (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no deadline here. I understand that you are probably looking to get paid but that is not Wikipedia's problem. Jytdog (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jytdoy, that's unfair. Wikipedia makes it open for everyone who can edit to edit BODLY when possible. That's exactly what I did. I don't care if the page is placed under review. I won't move it back to mainspace to prove to you that I'm not expecting to get paid. I only wanted you to be fair and stop making unfounded accusations. Wikipedia is an open source. Other Wikipedia languages are not like this. Take care and goodbye..

You moved it back to draft without submitting it to the review process... How then would your editors review it? The draft has been lying idle ever since you draftified it. So, could you submit it to the review process? Just sick and tired of what some of you do here..
 * You can submit it anytime you want, by clicking the submit button. It is unlikely to be accepted, as it is promotional, but you can submit it. Jytdog (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 19:09, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 01:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 01:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)