User talk:Afus199620

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Life chart
Just so your aware I will be moving your nice little charts from country article's to the main demographic article.... as this type of chart information is better handled on the demographics of page that will already have many stats of this nature and in the same format.--Moxy (talk) 23:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Please link where you have moved it to. Waddie96 (talk) 07:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it, Demographics of South Africa, can I ask, can the table be modified so that Period and Life Expectancy all in single column and a column is added that indicates  and  ? Waddie96 (talk) 07:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Updated it. Waddie96 (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Premananda966 (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of Chad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahr el-Ghazal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Demographics_of_Chad check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Demographics_of_Chad?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

List of countries by number of births
I'm reviewing List of countries by number of births. I can't quite figure out how you arrive at the numbers you use. For example, https://population.un.org gives 10.6 births per 1,000 population for the Netherlands for 2015-2020. How do you get to 905? Do you assume a population of approximately 17 million an annual birth rate per 1000 of 10.6 over 5 years? Vexations (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The Netherlands had 905,000 births in 2015-2020. Go to and click on "interactive data" and then on "Number of births, both sexes combined (thousands)". Here you can find all the data.--Afus199620 (talk) 06:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (List of administrative divisions of Myanmar by Human Development Index) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of administrative divisions of Myanmar by Human Development Index, Afus199620!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The 'Medium' and 'Low' headings don't work in a sortable table."

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Graph placement
Like all the work you did on the age chart....others may revert....but don't take it personally. Just wanted you to read over WP: sandwich....last thing we want is you being reverted only because you happened to sandwich text between two images. Just make sure there is room in the section before adding.--Moxy (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of countries by age structure
Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Afus199620, thanks for creating List of countries by age structure!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of countries by dependency ratio
Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Afus199620, thanks for creating List of countries by dependency ratio!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

About India HDI rank
Please update List of Indian states and territories by Human Development Index with this source as you did for other HDI sub national articles. Remove old list.--203.163.232.22 (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Please help update the list.--203.163.242.38 (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * But i have already updated it.
 * No No brother you haven't updated it in the India HDI List as you did in German HDI List or UK HDI List. India HDI List need to updated. So Please check.--116.72.130.154 (talk) 04:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Human Capital Index


A tag has been placed on Draft:Human Capital Index requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30498/33252.pdf?sequ. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:Human Capital Index, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Alphabet Inc.
Hi Afus199620, and thanks for your contributions to Alphabet Inc. I noticed, though, that the numbers provided go back to 2005, while the company has only existed since 2015. Are you sure the source is reliable? If so, where do these numbers come from? Regards. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 19:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Numbers before 2015 are for Google.--Afus199620 (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

CMHK
You can't use Pepsi data for an unrelated company. Also CMHK is not a listed company but a subsidiary, their data are only partially announced in the annual report of the parent company, which is a listed company. Matthew hk (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

WP:NOSTATS
Please use reliable source such as Bloomberg and Reuters and may be primary source such as company annual report. Please don't insert stats. table but write a lengthy year-to-yearly paragraph.

Only if those paragraphs existed, a table may be inserted as supplement. Also, it is not quite encyclopedic for share price, P/E or P/B in wikipedia, an general purpose encyclopedia (wikipedia is not an investment guide). Matthew hk (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Regarding Microsoft, please cite the actual annual report with page number, not a single web link that direct people to download 10 years of annual reports and look in the whole report to find the data. Matthew hk (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Could you please stop destroying all my work!!! I added the right source and all the data is correct!--Afus199620 (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NOSTATS, WP:NOTAGUIDE and WP:V. Please properly cite the figures (actual link of annual report with page number, or news article from WP:reliable source) and please don't just add stats. table. Matthew hk (talk) 08:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No one ever complained about my contributions except for you. Could you please show some good will before you destroy two weeks of my work and give me time to ad better sources. And tables are just the best for this kind of stats. Best wishes.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:NOSTATS:"Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context."
 * Matthew hk (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The statistics are in context, make sense and are not confusing. No one complained about them. And why do you think that you are the person making the rules???--Afus199620 (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Also the same MoS WP:NOSTATS (my emphasis in bold):"To provide, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." Matthew hk (talk) 08:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The sources are clearly independent and correct.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:Primary source is not independent actually. Despite I suggested you to cite the actual annual report, not a single web links for 10 years of annual reports. However, the ideal citation should be reliable secondary source. Those US listed company are well reported by WSJ, NYTimes, Reuters and Bloomberg, you just did not dig out those news article for your content. Matthew hk (talk) 08:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Then give me some time for that please. And annual reports by corporations are reliable sources and are used in these articles many times.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Again, just DON'T use https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/annual-reports.aspx (an index page for multi-year reports)
 * Use https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/annualreports/ar2018/downloadcenter (for 2018), and cite book and page/pages, or userp
 * Ideally use secondary source such as with primary source as supplement
 * Write paragraph for the context of those data, table is a supplement . Matthew hk (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean with paragraph? Could you please give me an example how you want it to look like.--Afus199620 (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You can look at Economy of Russia for some insight, you can paraphrase those news article (and cite those article) on what contributed to the revenues increase/decrease of that year of that company (Windows 7 may be for some year? May be the sales of iPhone?) Just need to paraphrase and did not need your own analysis (WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH) A plain paragraph just to describe the data increase/decrease is a plain WP:routine/WP:trivial content. Matthew hk (talk) 09:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The problem is that my English is not good enough to write long articles. Could I please do it in form of a table. There are many such articles with tables like in The Walt Disney Company and a 10-year oversight over important stats like in revenue and earnings surely has an encyclopedic value.--Afus199620 (talk) 09:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The Walt Disney Company is a classic example of WP:NOSTATS. That page may actually updated by staff which is very very not suitable due to WP:paid, or something that should be removed but no one challenged yet (classic WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST). It may be less trivial for all Disney chairmen in the list in that page are blue-link, but such listing in other companies are usually removed due to excessive red link.

For a paragraph for those financial data, missing one or two years of details is fine. Also those table can be trimmed to just 5 years or 10 years, which reduce the amount to paraphrase from news report of the annual earning. Matthew hk (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Visa Inc., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 08:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Amazon (company). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It should have at least 13 links of individual annual report with page number for 13 annual data (or 13 news articles published in 13 different years), not 3 links for people to download the reports and read the report page by page. Matthew hk (talk) 08:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I did not add unsourced content. I want to complain about this.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

USD$
Hi! For US currency, you can use USD or US$ but never USD$. The D and the $ both stand for 'dollar', so USD$ becomes United States dollars dollars. Also, the template may be useful to you. Cheers.  Stepho  talk 14:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

1th
And the ordinal number for 1 is 1st, not 1th! (It goes 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th.)Ehrenkater (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

HDI of Baltic regions
Hi, could you please add or update the HDI data for the Baltic regions as shown in List of Baltic regions by Human Development Index? Thanks J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 09:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, you mean add the the HDI data in the articles of the Baltic regions?--Afus199620 (talk) 09:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, or update them (in the case of some). Thanks J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 09:41, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem, I can do that. Could you please help me to add HDI data for Regions of Italy, NUTS statistical regions of the United Kingdom, States of Germany and U.S. states. I just don't get how to add the HDI values in these Articles.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of countries by gross national savings
Hello, Afus199620,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating List of countries by gross national savings! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 11:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy (belated) Christmas!
I was on holiday in Singapore since December 18th until yesterday, and did not have a chance to send you a message earlier! J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 07:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Happy New Year! Hello Afus199620: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 13:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Human Capital Index


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Human Capital Index, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Binod Basnet  (talk)  14:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Nigerian states by GDP. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please cite the exact page where you got your information from the document. Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Why did you reverted my third version? I gave you the correct source with pages.

A page you started (List of countries by past and future population density) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of countries by past and future population density.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 16:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at General Motors, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not want to vandalize anything. Sorry if i gave a incorrect source.--Afus199620 (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 08:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of countries by tariff rate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_countries_by_tariff_rate check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_countries_by_tariff_rate?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of the largest trading partners of France


Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of the largest trading partners of France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of regions of New Zealand by GDP


Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of regions of New Zealand by GDP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Swiss companies by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Swiss_companies_by_revenue check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Swiss_companies_by_revenue?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Human Capital Index


Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Human Capital Index".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 15:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (List of countries by airline passengers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of countries by airline passengers.

User:Whoisjohngalt while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of East Asian people by net worth


The article List of East Asian people by net worth has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unnecessary content forking, we already have separates lists for these countries"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jklamo (talk) 12:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest Danish companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_largest_Danish_companies check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_largest_Danish_companies?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

List of largest companies in Ireland
Hi, Have reviewed your new page. A couple of things:
 * 'The figures below are given in billions of US dollars'. I think they are in millions - needs changing.
 * 'All 18 companies from Ireland are listed.' not sure what that last sentence is. Might need removing?

Regards, Willbb234 (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating List of largest companies in South Africa.

User:Lefcentreright while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 16:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Brookfield Asset Management
On 2 August 2019 you edited the page Brookfield Asset Management replacing the 2017 income figures with those for 2018; however, you did not update the citation to reflect where you got the 2018 figures. The remaining citation shows the verification for the 2017 figures which you removed. When you edit a Wikipedia article you need to provide sources. You cannot just update figures and ignore existing sources. See Verifiability and Citing sources. Let me know if you have any questions. --Bejnar (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Honeywell Financials

 * Hello Afus199620, I noticed you added the finance section to the Honeywell article. I am updating the sentence with the most current financial information. This sentence now lives in the 2002–present: Acquisitions and further expansion section. Can you take a look at the updated version of my request?

For the fiscal year 2018, Honeywell reported net income of US$6.765 billion, with an annual revenue of US$41.802 billion, an increase of 3.13% over the previous fiscal cycle. Honeywell's shares traded at over $169 per share, and its market capitalization was valued at over US$120.26 billion in September 2019. -Chefmikesf (talk) 22:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Very Good. Thank you.--Afus199620 (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Afus199620 Due to my COI, I cannot update the sentence. Can you update the information on the Honeywell article?--Chefmikesf (talk) 17:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Afus199620Thanks so much! Sorry, I should have been more clear up front. To keep the section succinct, can you remove the sentence with the 2017 data? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chefmikesf (talk • contribs) 17:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey Afus199620, Do you have interest to make more updates to the Honeywell Wikipedia article? I have some updates in the lead paragraph needing attention on the Talk:Honeywell. They are pretty straight forward, factual updates with sources.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

2020 Honeywell Updates

Hello Afus199620, I see there are a few updates to the tables on the Honeywell article. Do you mind helping with these small updates? Thanks in advance!--Chefmikesf (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

1.

Minor Updates

Corporate governance

Remove inactive board member  Jaime Chico Pardo

Remove inactive board member Bradley T. Sheares

Add new board member  Deborah Flint

Add new board member Raymond T. Odierno

Acquisitions

Add Tru-Trak Flight Systems to the acquisition table

2.

One Sentence Addition
 * Hi Afus199620, Thank you for the updates to the Honeywell article. I noticed one more important sentence missing. Would you mind adding this sentence as the last sentence of the 2015–present section?


 * In September 2020, Honeywell and their predecessor AlliedSignal, celebrated their 100 year anniversary on the NYSE.

--Chefmikesf (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Honeywell Acquisitions
Hello , Thanks for your help with the Honeywell finance section. Would you be open to helping with the Acquisition table? I made some simple clean up and reference suggestions below. Thanks in advance! All the edits below are drafted up in my sandbox, here.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * . Done now.--Afus199620 (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, Thank you so much!--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

1. Updating Honeywell Acquisitions table – my hope is that the edits below will make this article more NPOV and correct. This edit request adds references to existing parts of the table and updates all the business groups to the current four business groups.

Proposed new Acquisition table

Cheers

 * Thank you, Greetings and Merry Christmas.--Afus199620 (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Non-reliable source?
Hello A: I noticed you added large sections to numerous stock index articles that refer to the website http://www.1stock1.com. That site certainly does not appear to be a reliable source. Can you provide any background or explanation for the additions? Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, You're right. I changed the articles to a different/additional source now.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Preview – Consolidate – Summarize
Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits: Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 22:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
 * The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
 * Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).
 * Hello again. Please do ask for help if you have trouble grasping any of the above concepts. Eric talk 20:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Verizon "Finances" section
Hi Afus199620, a while back you created the "Finances" section at Verizon Communications. Could you take a look at my Verizon Communications Talk page request to add recently reported financials? As I work for Verizon and have a conflict of interest, I ask others to look at my request and make edits on my behalf. I'm posting a note here in case you did not see my ping at Talk:Verizon Communications. Thank you, VZEric (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest companies in the United States by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Chester, Ohio ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_largest_companies_in_the_United_States_by_revenue check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_largest_companies_in_the_United_States_by_revenue?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Johnson & Johnson Corporate governance and Infobox
Hey Afus199620, How are you? I noticed some inaccuracies and omissions in the Infobox and Corporate governance sections of the Johnson & Johnson Article. Here are the suggested improvements to each part of the article. Do you have any interest in collaborating on this project? Let me know if there are any questions!--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of regions of Thailand by Human Development Index for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of regions of Thailand by Human Development Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of regions of Thailand by Human Development Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Lex Fridman moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lex Fridman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Xu
Hello Afus199620,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tony Xu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Are you having trouble with the concept of leaving an edit summary? Help is available. Eric talk 03:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

New Mansoura moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, New Mansoura, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Tony Xu Notability Defense
Hello Afus199620! I want to let you know that I added some good citations and moved around some of the narrative on Xu's page to conform to bio formatting and better flow. I also defended Xu's notability on his talk page. Thank you for creating the article as I believe he is an important figure in America business. LassoLaneFolks (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Fridman (January 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chicdat were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lex Fridman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lex Fridman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lex_Fridman Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chicdat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lex_Fridman reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 11:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ark Invest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ark Invest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ark Invest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FalconK (talk) 06:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of cities in Kagawa Prefecture by population


The article List of cities in Kagawa Prefecture by population has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The population statistics are on the prefecture's page Kagawa, Japan with better sources. Seems redundant to have this page?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fredlesaltique (talk) 02:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison between Indian states and countries by GDP (PPP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison between Indian states and countries by GDP (PPP), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Comparison between Chinese provinces and sovereign states by GDP PPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Beam Therapeutics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beam Therapeutics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beam Therapeutics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

List of countries by stock market capitalization
Well done here. A very needed article. Keep up the good work! Cheers-- Chanaka L ( talk ) 06:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Past and future population density by country a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

"List of countries by past and future population density)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of countries by past and future population density). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Defence Therapeutics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Defence Therapeutics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cities by total wealth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities by total wealth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of cities by total wealth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBchrch  talk  04:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization


A tag has been placed on List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. David Gerard (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 12:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Beam Therapeutics
Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beam Therapeutics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Konfio moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Konfio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beam Therapeutics


A tag has been placed on Beam Therapeutics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Beam Therapeutics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Historical data charts in county articles
Just so your aware before others revert your chart additions to main country articles...WikiProject Countries. Pls also review WP:SANDWICH. Moxy - 22:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * These should not be overly detailed charts.--Afus199620 (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Some will see it has historical data not covered in the prose text of the section ...thus considered historical over data best covered on main articles on the topics that covers historical information. Also if the data is not covered in the prose text it many not be the best choice of image as outlined st  MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. Also these images are an accessibility problem for those with disabilities as we should avoid using images in place of tables or charts for data as seen at WP:ACCESSIBILITY. Moxy -Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 22:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of countries by electricity price for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by electricity price is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of countries by electricity price until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * https://list.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page is a good place for this, if you want to save your work just copy it over. I think having a column listing year by year would be more useful.  I found it interesting to see how much the electricity of my country compared to the rest.   D r e a m Focus  18:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Defence Therapeutics
Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defence Therapeutics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Don't add wrong information
Please don't add wrong information in article list of cities in Maharashtra by adding wrong district name in result. Thenexttalk (talk) 06:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Defence Therapeutics


Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defence Therapeutics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Asians by net worth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Asians by net worth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Asians by net worth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Firepower Index for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Firepower Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Global Firepower Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Loafiewa (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Germany Trade and Invest moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Germany Trade and Invest, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  17:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Inner German relations
Hello, Afus199620,

Thank you for creating Inner German relations.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"There are various unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Meena • 21:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Original research in demographic data
Hi, Afus199620. Thanks for creating List of counties of Kenya by GDP. I've removed the last column, "Equivalent country", from the two tables in this article. This column contained a synthesis of data from multiple sources that doesn't exist in any one source; this amounts to prohibited original research. In particular, the column you added makes an assertion about the similarity in GDP between a given Kenyan county, and the GDP of another country in the world. However, no source actually contains an assertion about this comparison or equivalency; the assertion comes only from you in the research you did in multiple sources to find these equivalencies. Please be sure that all information you add to Wikipedia articles is verifiable, and can be backed up with a citation to a reliable source. The equivalence column does not meet this criterion, and thus had to be removed. For more information, see No original research. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I also removed the "Equivalent country" column from the tables at List of Swedish counties by GDP for the same reason. I found another dozen articles which also have the same problem, which will also need to have the same change applied to the tables in them (I didn't check to see if you are a contributor in those articles). There are too many of them for me to fix them all, so any help you could offer would be appreciated. For the list of articles and a more general discussion about this, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Verifiability is a requirement
I undid two of your recent changes to demographic articles, where you added 7kb of numeric data to Demographics of Ghana in this edit, and 5kb to Demographics of Cameroon in this edit. You provided a citation to https://population.un.org/wpp/ in both cases, but in neither case does that web page support the changes you made. Wikipedia's policy of WP:Verifiability is a core policy requirement; you may not add massive amounts of data of this type to an article without an "inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." The term directly supports means that a given piece of material "is present explicitly in the source". I removed your edits in those two cases, because the source you gave "does not support the claim".

I fear that this may be but the tip of a very large iceberg, because in going over some edits of yours recently, it seems that you have used this same source to support addition of numeric data in dozens, or perhaps hundreds, of demographic articles, and it may be that this source does not support any of them. I hope that is not the case. For starters, please stop making any further unsupported changes to numeric data in demographic articles and be sure that all the figures you add or change are directly traceable to a reliable source. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, you can verify all changes when you download the second Excel file from the World Population Prospects. First click on "Download Data Files", then you can click on the second file called "Complete (estimates and all projection scenarios) (XLSX, 93.06 MB)". See here: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/ There you can view and verify demographic data for all countries and territories. Unfortunately, this database is not easy to navigate for beginners. You can also use the Data Portal at the same Website or find the same data here: https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-update-2022#:~:text=The%20world%20population%20will%20pass%208%20billion%20at%20the%20end%20of%202022&text=It%20passed%20its%20last%20milestone,growth%20rate%20continues%20to%20fall.


 * The World Population Prospects are the most used source for demographic statistics on Wikipedia, and in most cases I just updated existing data with the new 2022 update.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Whatever happened on the article before you got there is on someone else; but when you made a change and included a citation, then you took ownership of verifiability for the assertions you added. The link you added clearly does not support the content you added. The fact that you can point to other links here on your Talk page is nice, but it is not relevant to the policy of WP:Verifiability. I see that you have reverted the two articles, restoring citations that do not verify the assertions you added. Please add a citation to the article that verifies your assertions that is "present explicitly in the source". The article in its current state does not conform to WP:Verifiability policy. Consider this a formal WP:CHALLENGE. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The indicated source does confirm the WP:Verifiability. You just haven't called up the data that's in the given source. I don't know any other way to link to the data. Do you know how to link from Wikipedia directly to an Excel file? --Afus199620 (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it does not, I checked it. Only the linked files do, and the page you cited could be changed and no longer link to them tomorrow. It would be like linking to "bbc.com" instead of an article linked from bbc's home page; it's fine for today, but tomorrow it may no longer be there; you have to link to the specific BBC article that has the actual text that verifies the information you've placed in the Wikipedia article. Otherwise, it's not verifiable.
 * If you can access the pop. data on the internet, whether it be a web page, image, Excel file, or whatever, that's because it has a Uniform Resource Locator. Your browser always exposes the URL to you in the browser address bar. Since you know how to get to the Excel file, all you have to do to get its URL is to copy it out of the address bar. Since it is a web resource, linking to it is no different than linking to any external link in a reference, such as linking the title of a book to a Google books url for that title. Or, were you asking that once you have the resource, you're not sure how to cite it, whether in plain text, or using one of the templates? Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't find where the URL is in the Excel file. I don't know where to find the address bar in the Excel file. Therefore, I can't link it.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * When you click it, it's there. But give me a Wikipedia article name, the citation number or link to it, and the name (anchor, label, linktext) of the Excel file as it appears on that page, and I will explain how to get the link to it. Mathglot (talk) 09:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I want to change reference No. 7 in Demographics of Nepal. It should directly link to the Excel file called Complete (estimates and all projection scenarios) (XLSX, 93.17 MB). You can find it here: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/ (second file in the second column). How can I link it now?--Afus199620 (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * That's doable; this is becoming targeted now to a solution for this specific footnoting question, and deserves its own section; see below. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Municipalities of Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Konfio
Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Konfio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Citing the spreadsheet linked from the UN population website
Thanks for that specific Nepal example in your 08:19 2 August post above. In order to give you the best answer, I need to ask some questions. Iirc, you told me somewhere that the same UN source is used as a reference in numerous Wikipedia demographic articles. (True?) If so, I wanted to ask: If 'yes' to all three, there's a solution that will make this quite easy for you, but even if not, it's still doable. If #1=no and #2=yes (i.e., the exact same excel sheet is linked from different UN pages in the footnote in other WP demographic articles) then please give me two or three more WP article examples, showing the same XLSX/93.17MB being linked from different UN urls in the footnotes. Thanks. Mathglot (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Do all those WP articles refer to precisely the same url population page: 'https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/', or does the url in the WP article footnote sometimes vary from one WP article to another?
 * 2) Is the spreadsheet that contains the supporting data for the different WP articles always the same, 93.17 MB spreadsheet you indicated, or does it vary? (Just talking about 2022; I get it that it will vary next year for the 28th edition.)
 * 3) If always the same spreadsheet, is the sheet name that contains the verifying data for the article always the first one labeled 'Estimates'? (The spreadsheet linked from the reference sourced in Demo/Nepal note 7 has eleven tabs (a.k.a 'sheets') at the bottom from 'Estimates' on the left, then 'Medium variant', 'High variant', and so on, all the way to sheet 'NOTES' all the way on the right.)
 * I've made a start on this which you can see at Nepal #7. This was handled most easily by a template, which you can try out at cite UN WPP. It's still in testing, but feel free to play around with it on a few articles. Please list any bugs you find (or questions you have) below, and any "wish list" items can go on the Template talk page. Mathglot (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

So, here's a perfect example of why we need the direct citation to the data file in the first place: you see citation #10 at the Nepal article, at the end of the section? Note 10 also links (or used to link) to World Pop. Prospects, but in this case, the 2017 version of it. But not surprisingly, that old url is dead, and now it redirects to the 2022 page. So, whatever data tables were attached to that page in 2017, we don't know what they were. You might have luck with archive.org, but I don't feel that it's on me, as a reader, to chase down dead links in the Wayback Machine just to find an old page, just to see what data files are linked *from* that dead page, and then go chase *that* down. Note 7, which is discussed above, will *never* be lost, because we have a direct link to it now (so the page that used to link to it can die and it doesn't matter anymore) and if they take down the actual Excel file itself, it still doesn't matter, because we have the archive link to it in the citation; so now we have true verifiability for the data in Note 7. The new template will help cite things properly, and ensure verifiability across the board. Mathglot (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think the verifiability issue that I first noticed may be only the tip of a very large iceberg. I started to look for other articles where I could try out the template, and ended up at Demographics of Bangladesh, where note 26 also references WPP, this time, the 2016 version of it. The esa page url was dead, but preserved in the Internet archive, so I went to it. Unfortunately, that page is not the page with the data, just the page the data was linked *from*, and you can't get to it anymore. If the old, 2016 data is linked in the internet archive, we don't know about it, because you have to "execute a query" on the old page to get to it, and that doesn't work on the archived page. So, we're stuck. Basically, the Bangladesh life expectancy data is unverified in that article, which means, subject to removal from the article. Conceivably, the 2016 data was "copied forward" into the future tables, 2017, 2018, maybe even 2022; then again, they were estimates, so maybe they change a bit each year?  It's possible that the 2016 estimates are completely gone, or at least, will be a giant headache for someone to track down. Multiply this, by all the demographic articles at Wikipedia, and it's unsustainable; nobody could update all those articles, tracking down old, dead figures and replacing them with ones from the 2022 survey, even if they are the same figures, which we don't know.  The solution to this is two-fold:
 * Make sure to use direct citations to the data table itself, not to the web page which links to it, which is useless.
 * Make sure that the data table itself is in the internet archive. The 2022 WPP was *not* in the archive, so I added it today; it will be there forever, now, so the Nepal article footnote #7 will never go out of date.
 * Once we deal with the immediate footnoting problem that started this all off, I think we need to escalate this to WP:WikiProject Countries, as it probably affects hundreds of articles at Wikipedia that will need to be changed, so that they are verifiable, and remain that way. As for all the older tables that can no longer be verified, someone will have to sort that all out, and there may be a large number of them. Mathglot (talk) 10:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes to the first two questions. It's sometimes different spreadsheets. I mostly get it now. Thank you for your help. I tried it myself now, for Demographics of Chad, see footnote #7.


 * Unfortunately, many articles link to old versions of the World Pop. Prospects. A cleanup is needed, that old data is to be updated with links to the new version. But this is work for more than one person.--Afus199620 (talk) 12:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's a lot of data added to the Chad article, I hope you have a tool to make that easier! (If not, I think there must be one somewhere.) That looks great, and the footnote, too. Did you have any particular difficulties figuring out how to do it?  Did you kind of just copy & change it from the Nepal footnote, or did you take a look at the template doc page at all? The reason I ask, is that I'm aware that the doc page is still sparse, and will have to be beefed up so it's clear and comprehensive. But however you did it, you successfully created the new footnote at Demographics of Chad. Congrats&mdash;that footnote will never go out of date, and the Chad data from the original UN source will always be available for anyone in the future who wants to go back verify the numbers you added to the article. (Also, I see you figured out how to add the links to the abbreviations in the column header row.)  Can you add just the footnote using the template at Demographics of Ghana and Demographics of Cameroon mentioned above? Should just be a one-line change to each one. Lmk if any issues.
 * As far as cleanup, it would be a big win if we could start by just updating the "Source: WPP" footnote in different articles to point to previous-year data, whether it's 2020,, 2017, or whatever. Old data in the article is okay, as long as its verifiable, and for that, we need to point to the old spreadsheet that someone found originally. If we can find it, that would mean just a one line-change per article, instead of a massive update like the one you did at the Chad article. (Not trying to discourage updates to 2022 data&mdash;clearly that's better because the data is newer, but that's a lot of work.) If we can find the old WPP spreadsheets online somewhere for previous years, that would be ideal; it might even be possible to request a bot that would run through all the articles, updating that one little "Source:" line that appears, using the new template. In one bot run, unverifiable data in hundreds of articles could be fixed. Then, country-editors could come along at their leisure, updating the articles to 2022 data if they wanted; but whether they did or not, at least the old data in the article would be compliant with WP:Verifiability.
 * If you're willing, I think you and I would make a great team to organize and advocate for getting this done. I don't know anything about country population data and never even heard of the WPP until you told me, but I have some strengths in template writing and understanding how to translate that into easy solutions for verifiability for country pop. data (whether it's found in spreadsheets, or elsewhere.) You have a ton of knowledge and experience with the sources of population data, and the demographic articles at Wikipedia that use them, and how best to incorporate that data most efficiently. I'm not suggesting that we *do* all the updates, that would be too much work; just that we figure out what needs to be done, organize our thoughts, and prepare some kind of writeup for WP:WikiProject Countries explaining the current situation, and our recommendation about how to avoid problems going forward (I think we know that part already) and how/whether to repair the problems with demographic articles pointint to old data; hopefully that would be the germ of some kind of task force at the WikiProject (or maybe a bot) to handle it, as well as a recommendation (possibly even added by consensus as a line in a Wikipedia guideline) about how to source pop. data. How does that sound to you?
 * Finally, I realize that this is becoming lengthy, and it's about a topic that really is more and more about a much bigger topic than the footnote at Demographics of Ghana that started this all out above, and more and more O/T for your Talk page. So, I propose we find a more centralized venue for this discussion, and start up fresh elsewhere. For starters, I think a WP:SUBPAGE of the Countries WikiProject Talk page would be the logical place: it's appropriate to the topic there, it won't be overly obtrusive or hijack the main Countries Talk page, and we'll be free to brainstorm and develop a brief writeup for the Countries Talk page, while still preserving the historical record. Probably someplace like subpage Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Verifiability of population data (or some other name), where we'll be free to continue this discussion without hijacking your talk page any further. (I'll leave links back and forth to make it easy to find.) Lmk your thoughts about how easy/hard it was to use the template (including the doc), about teaming up on this, and your preference about a possible new venue for continuing this discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, one other thing: I'm trying to find the spreadsheet for any other year, like 2021, 2017, whatever. Once we have that, I can update the template so it automatically picks the right url when you specify the year in param 1. If you know how to find the spreadsheet for any other year, please let me know. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Just so we don't duplicate effort, I found most of 2019 at the internet archive so if we want to include it in the template, it's possible. It was a big pain to find it, and at least one is missing but most of it is there. Before I think about incorporating it into the template, though, I wanted to chat with you about that. Oh, also: the 2019 WPP is version 26, and 2022 WPP is version 27, so either they skipped some years (covid?) or they only come out every three years? Do you happen to know the frequency? Mathglot (talk) 06:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Talk about duplicating effort! I just happened to be browsing at Demographics of Bangladesh, and I noticed that someone used template UN population to generate a reference pretty much like the one like cite UN WPP does; wish I'd seen that before! Might have to drop my template, or see if it does things the other one doesn't, and maybe merge them. Anyway, this doesn't really change anything wrt teaming up at the project to try to get stuff verified properly; doesn't really matter how the proper data source gets linked, whether through template A or template B or manually; the important thing is that it does; a template is just a tool to make the job easier. Mathglot (talk) 08:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * . Yes, I already have tools to convert the data to make my work easier. My problem was just to link to the Excel file. I copied the link from the Nepal article and copied it into the Chad article. I just had to change the rows after that. That solved my problem. Thanks you for that.


 * I think it would be a great idea to raise this issue at WP:WikiProject Countries. Unfortunately, I don't know anything about templates and I mostly do statistics and translations in the English-language Wikipedia. I'm not comfortable writing long texts in English, therefore it would be nice if you could explain the situation properly there. This would be an important improvement for demographic statistics on Wikipedia.


 * Old spreadsheets should be here: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Archive/Standard/.


 * It would be the best thing in my opinion if we could all update old data in relation to the WPPs. The new version has important revisions and is not in all cases harmonizing with older versions. For example, different population estimates for past years that could irritate readers. The best thing would be some shared project to update all or at least most demographic statistics on these kinds of articles, who source to the WPPS. I mostly did uch an update for the historical vital statistics for many third world countries, but much work remains to be done.


 * The WPPs are normaly every two years. Because of the Impact of COVID-19 on mortality this update was delayed one year. I don't know if they changed the rhythm now. Next one should be in 2023 or 2024.--Afus199620 (talk) 20:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Your English is great, but I understand why you wouldn't want to do a writeup; I can do that part. (I found your de user page, and if you need a copy of the template over there, I can create one. My German is intermediate level; understand most, but my writing is pretty bad. Ich bleibte ein Sommer als teenager am Starnberger See; die kennst du sicherlich.) Anyway, I need to come back and respond to your other points later. Tschüss! Mathglot (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Further to previous message: so, the new template is not a duplicate in its most important aspect, as it gives direct verifiability where there was none before. The UN population template provides a similar, citation style reference, but minus the direct link. (I've commented about this at template talk page.) So, we can keep using the new one to expand verifiability (which will also support verifiability for future years).
 * I have additional feedback to your last message regarding previous year data, but I think it works better at a common venue (in this case, the Template talk page). Mathglot (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Note: Just to be clear: this is *your* talk page, so you get to handle it pretty much the way you want, within reason. I rolled up this discussion because I thought you would prefer it, but the discussion is not "closed", you can reply, you can keep the box but default to "show" (i.e., "expanded") by setting no, or you can undo it so it was the way it was before; it's your call. Mathglot (talk) 05:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Great job, and a tip
Hi Afus199620. I've been away from demographics for a little bit (working on French history), and just got back, and saw that you've made great progress, congrats! Normally, almost all the articles that use the UN WPP, are using data from the 'Estimates' worksheet (the first, i.e., left-most one) and when they do, you don't have to do anything special, because the 'Estimates' sheet is what the template cites by default, if you don't tell it otherwise. I have noticed one or two articles that cited other sheets, like the 'Medium variants' sheet. Not sure if you had a chance to check out the template doc, but it has a way to pick the right worksheet, if it isn't the 'Estimates' sheet; for example, you can add Medium variants (or any of the others) to specify the correct one. Maybe you already knew this; I only had a chance to look at a few of the ones you updated. Anyway, thanks, and keep up the good work! I'll try and do a few myself, if only to get a better sense of the real world situation out there, and make sure the template is adequate for the job.

Have a question for you: I'm still undecided about adding the ability to handle previous year data to the template. I've seen demographic articles citing UN WPP version as far back as 2010, but I imagine it's probably better to just update the numbers in our articles to 2022 data, than trying to cite them to 10-year old data. I've seen more articles that reference the '2019' one than the really old ones, so maybe it's worth doing that, what do you think? It wouldn't be particularly hard, and it would also 'prepare the terrain', so to speak, for updating the template so that when the 2024 one comes out it will be very easy to just slide that one in there. Anyway, since you're really familiar with the demographic end of this, it just really helps to have feedback from you about this. Thanks again for running with this; I feel like with every edit you do, we're improving verifiability in the Countries project! Mathglot (talk) 08:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, Afus199620, I've made significant improvements to the documentation of Cite UN WPP, especially in the area of short footnotes. If you find yourself using the template more than once in the same article, that's a sign that you could benefit from using short citations. There's a new section explaining how to use the template in articles where you need to refer to the UN population report more than once, and a new "Examples" section at the bottom that clearly demonstrates it. Please let me know if there's anything there that isn't clear, or that you think needs improvement. Mathglot (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Removal of HDI table by another editor
Hi Afus199620, I'd like your feedback regarding the removal by another editor of a large table of HDI trends data from an article. I'm not sure what (if anything) to do about it, and I'd appreciate your advice.

A brand new editor recently removed an entire HDI trends table from this HDI article. This table was originally added to the article by you, in this edit back in 2018. I challenged their large removal at Talk, and they responded by saying (without evidence) that they removed the table because the data "was incorrect", and because it contained "made up numbers". Tracking it down, I see that the table was copied from de-wiki revision 179939937 (12. Aug. 2018) of Liste der indischen Bundesstaaten nach dem Index der menschlichen Entwicklung which you created and added the table on 5 August. Knowing your attention to detail and sourcing, I don't believe a word of what this editor has to say in their comments about the data table they removed, and the removal is no doubt improper.

So here's my question for you: what is the best thing to do at this article now, if anything? I'm not sure if it's worth undoing their removal and reinstalling the trends table based on the 2018 data or not. Maybe the data is old enough that removing it doesn't matter at this point, so doing nothing in an option? I'll leave it up to you whether you think it's worth adding a comment at the Talk page discussion here, or just let it go. As for me, I've already challenged the editor once on the removal, and I don't know whether it's worth challenging them a second time based on their dubious comments about sourcing, or just let that go, too.

More generally, I'm curious what you think the important factors are in responding to editors who might remove a lot of data or even whole tables from the demographic articles. If the data is old (like, 2018, say) should I even bother commenting about such a removal, or just let it go? What do you think are the important principles here that should be observed? Thanks in advance for your thoughts, Mathglot (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Mathglot, thanks for noticing this. The data I added were surely not "made up numbers". Just making up numbers of these kinds of statistics would be beyond my personal creativity. It's possible they got updated and changed retroactive. The source is still the same. You can find it here https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/IND/?levels=1+4&interpolation=0&extrapolation=0 with numbers going back to 1990. Instead of removing the content, they could have just updated it. I will take a look at the list myself.
 * Unfortunately, many lists and articles about Indian demographics and social statistics have a lot of chaotic editing and also some cases of blatant vandalism.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I pretty much guessed what you confirmed here, I just wasn't sure whether it was worth following up on, or not. I'll leave it to you to decide if, and how, you might want to address this. If you need any support from me on this (or on anything), feel free to ping me any time. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Average human height by country
I would like to invite you to a request for comment. I think you have a good and clear opinion that you should make known.2A0A:A546:4576:0:71CB:63BC:CC95:66A9 (talk) 13:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of largest cryptocurrency exchanges


The article List of largest cryptocurrency exchanges has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Based on a single questionable source, a Statista listing that does not cite its own sources; actual data appears to be skimmed from coinmarketcap, which lists often-faked volume from exchanges. There appears to be no Wikipedia-suitable sourcing for this topic; it is not possible to write an article on this topic based on RSes at this time, or indeed in the time this article has existed."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for creating Willi Voss. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   20:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations


The article Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of any notability for this combination, no indepth independent sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 07:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Germany–Guyana relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Germany–Guyana relations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Germany–Guyana relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Germany–Haiti relations. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   03:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Please provide precise source location
Hello. Regarding your edit Special:Diff/1120238411, the cited URL https://population.un.org/wpp/ is too vague thus impossible to locate the source because there are hundreds of pages and files under that. Please provide a precise URL and necessary information so readers can obtain and verify it (ideally in one click). I guess your source is https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Files/1_Indicators%20(Standard)/EXCEL_FILES/1_General/WPP2022_GEN_F01_DEMOGRAPHIC_INDICATORS_COMPACT_REV1.xlsx so I've put an example here: Special:Diff/1120486988. Wotheina (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Bahrain–Germany relations. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Bahrain–Germany relations. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

HDI sourcing
Hi again. I've reverted a few HDI dev. pages that didn't have the data in the given source. Also, could you please stop using the expression "as of 2023 with data for the year 2021" as that seems meaningless to me. What is it you are trying to say, here? If it's about when you made the edit (i.e., "in 2023") nobody reading the article will care, and it's preserved in the history, for any editor trying to track changes in the article, so you don't need to say it. Mathglot (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You're right. I corrected it now.--Afus199620 (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, looks good. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of German cities by GDP, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Herne and Worms.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Personal union of Poland and Saxony. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   08:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of cities with a million or more inhabitants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

About Senegal....
About Senegal, do you know the recent types of information of the nation? Hence I have seen some edits on the population based on its recent census (being 2023). So I was wondering if you know any sources in regards to all of the level types of the administrative sub-division territorial units. Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, you can find Departments of Senegal here:
 * https://www.citypopulation.de/en/senegal/admin/
 * Greetings. Other subdivisions, I don't know, unfortunately. --Afus199620 (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Greetings. I have checked that link. However, you have no knowledge or acknowledgement yet in regards with the villages or quartiers within the 'communautes rurales' and communes within Senegal? jlog3000 (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No, unfortunately not. I don't know if results are published yet. It will probably be published here.
 * https://www.ansd.sn/theme/demographie.--Afus199620 (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood. And I hope so eventually. But I appreciate your feedback and honesty in that regard by far. Thanks in advance. jlog3000 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

List of cities with a million or more inhabitants
I suggest you should change title to

"List of cities with a population of over 1 million inhabitants"

Because technically even 1,000,001 is over 1 million

No need for "million or more" 84.15.182.142 (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure. But cities with exactly 1,000,000 inhabitants will also be included. This is at least a theoretical possibility.--Afus199620 (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * For that matter, "a" is not a number but rather gibberish or slurred speech or slang, as the closest word to "uh", and is thus unencyclopedic. The "or more" is totally redundant anyway. "with one million inhabitants" is included in "more than one million". If there's 1,000,0001 then there's already also 1,000,000. Oh yeah I forgot. "Inhabitants" is redundant to "population". The population is nothing else but inhabitants! :) And how is this article not redundant altogether against others like lists of metropolises or whatever? What's the point of this article? The title says "cities" and most of the entries are simply not cities. This article's name is inconsistent with the format of other similar articles, even those in its own "see also" section. — Smuckola(talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I will try to explain.
 * This is a list of cities/municipalities (so called city proper) and not of agglomerations or metropolitan areas. This is a clear difference. Don't get confused by names of municipalities or administrative divisions in different countries. The definition is clear and always indicated.
 * I made this list because I found the other ones to be lacking quality. The List of largest cities uses a ranking by the UN that mixes up metropolitan areas, urban areas and city propers. The data for city propers and metropolitan areas there is not even giving the dates of the estimates. This list is very confusing.
 * I think the list is not redundant. It is listing specifically municipalities/city propers over a certain population size, and not just vaguely the "largest cities". I also tried to give the specific administrative boundaries for every city and the date of estimate with sources. You generally don't find that in the other lists. I tried to make an improvement. It was a lot of work and such lists will obviously never be perfectly.--Afus199620 (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello. You did not provide a reliable source WP:RS for any of your recent edits to Durango (city) here. We can't just make up numbers. That last source is about Ecuador, and the previous numbers have no source whatsoever (WP:RS WP:OR). We must always provide, replace, or update the access-date, of a reliable source. Please immediately fix or revert that anywhere you've done this on the encyclopedia. That's absolutely mandatory by policy. Thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It was a mistake. I will correct.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Muchas gracias! We have a lot of editors who only edit statistics and they don't care about rules. ;) I mean a lot! And they're very stubborn. So thank you very much. — Smuckola(talk) 07:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Population changes
Hi, I have seen that you had made changes to the articles relating to Indian states with a projected population. Are you sure that the source you had provided is a reliable source WP:RS. All these years, the official population of 2011 census has been used as a standard as other demographics are based on that. Has there been a discussion on this? Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Should be reliable. Isn't this official or semi-official website? 2011 is pretty outdated now. --Afus199620 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is definitely not the official website and it doesn't quote any primary source for the projections as well. As I have pointed out, while the projections were for the previous years as well, official data was used all the while from 2011 census and the other demographics are based on that as well. If you are not sure if it is a reliable source or if there are no primary sources for the projection, it is a point that might warrant further discussion as it affects quite a lot of pages. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Use Indian government sources only for census data. Estimations and figures provided by sites like census2011.co.in are unreliable. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This is sorted I hope. @Afus199620 Do you have any further comments on this? Hope you will make the changes as discussed. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes @Magentic Manifestations. Do you think this is an acceptable source?: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/reports-0. It is clearly from the Indian government.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see a reason to use estimates even if it comes from the government institutions, unless used in a particular context, in the article body and not the infobox. If you want you can discuss it at WP:INB. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of association football clubs by average attendance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of association football clubs by average attendance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of association football clubs by average attendance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dakoro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakoro Department.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Dietenhausen. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Afus199620! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Ar-Ramtha District. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

International Holding Company moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to International Holding Company. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

"Meeting the of the heads of state of German-speaking countries" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meeting_the_of_the_heads_of_state_of_German-speaking_countries&redirect=no Meeting the of the heads of state of German-speaking countries] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Can you create article “List of prefecture-level divisions”
Hello can you create article “List of prefecture-level divisions by GDP”. You create article and I can add the data because I don’t have account and can’t create myself. There is article “Chinese provinces by GDP” but some prefectures have like 10 million inhabitants and deserve separate article. 84.15.186.166 (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I fix myself
 * “List of prefecture-level divisions of China by GDP” 84.15.186.166 (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Where can I find the data? Could you create the article in your sandbox? I can move it to the article room then.--Afus199620 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You can create your sandbox and i can put data. Or you can create empty article and i would add data.
 * i would extract data from this table List of prefectures in China 84.15.186.166 (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I put table into your sandbox
 * User:Afus199620/sandbox 84.15.186.166 (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Most of Chinese GDP data in Chinese Wikipedia.
 * For example prefectures in Anhui province:
 * https://w.wiki/9XgP

84.15.186.166 (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please make a sandbox and I can move it. But there needs to be an official source for GDP data to link to. Not just Wiki data.--Afus199620 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I putted table in your sandbox User:Afus199620/sandbox and added sources 84.15.186.166 (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This seems to be outdated data from nearly 10 years ago. Are there no newer numbers? It would also be nice to have gdp per capital numbers and exchange rates to USD to make the data more useful.--Afus199620 (talk) 00:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Data differs for every province. Some have only 2015, some like 2017 and some 2022. Yes there is per capita numbers but I need too add it. Seems a lot of work. Do you want to create article and I would update it everyday by a bit or you only want to publish table with all latest data? 84.15.186.166 (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I will wait for newer data. You can continuously update it.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I updated table can you publish it 84.15.190.137 (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I published it under List of prefecture-level divisions of China by GDP now. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks 84.15.190.137 (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Checking in
Hi, Afus; just checking in. How's everything going? Any of the templates need updating? Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, Mathglot. Everything is going well, thanks. Not need for updates right now. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Branitz Palace. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   12:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Essershausen. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   12:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on List of sports clubs by membership. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color: #0000cc;">North8000</b> (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Laimbach. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Katherine Maher article --- I support you.
Hi Afus,

I was the first person to create a separate section about the recent incidences and I titled it "Criticism" which was then reverted because some policy against naming sections "Criticism". I then brought the separate section back under the title "Public image" and it has been reverted and unreverted for a while now. I reverted the revert once already lol and now it's reverted back in the big huge section. The ANTI-free speechers want to hid her deteriorating public image into a huge section so that people are less likely to see it. This is a disgrace on Wikipedia.

Alexysun (talk) 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support. I appreciate it. It's very sad to see this. Wikipedia should be unbiased and open. The whole thing about the Katherine Maher article is very disheartening and seems to be agenda driven.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on BIST 100. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   14:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Redcare Pharmacy. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   04:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

JakeshPradhan
JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)


 * JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on List of South African provinces by poverty rate. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color: #0000cc;">North8000</b> (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Moscow GDP
Hello Afus can you update Moscow GDP data from 2021 to 2022. To edit it requires to be "extended confirmed user".

Can you change GDP from ₽24.471 trillion to ₽28.507 trillion

Per capita from ₽1,935,205 to ₽2,182,863

New source:https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/VRP_s_1998.xlsx Source title: Валовой региональный продукт по субъектам Российской Федерации в 2016-2022 гг.

also GDP Demographics title from "Federal city" to "Total" GonzalezRio (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Nigerian states by literacy rate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nigerian states by literacy rate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Nigerian states by literacy rate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)