User talk:Agüeybaná/Archive 2

Welcome to Boricuaeddie's Talk Page.

'''Please enter new messages at the end of my page so I can find them easily. I will answer you in your talk page. Remember to sign your comments with ~. Thank You. Remember to spread the love!!! '''

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Block
I am offical begging that you look at my page. Some non-member has been adding comments after my political views. For on example I have "Pro-Life", and the he adds next to "Pro Fasctist". Some one else has undone his edits, but this has happened twice.Please look at my user pages history, and see the edits he made. Could you please get back to me soon, and suggest what I should do. Like comments from other users, etc.

Politics rule 11:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your concern. I really did not mean to put block. I followed your advice, and left a warning on his page. He has been warned by another person for the edits he made on my page too.

Thanks for responding and I wish this reaches you in good cheer,

Politics rule 20:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC) =)

Small comment
It's the use of the word "curtain", isn't it - I knew that was a step too far. I welcome and appreciate the sentiment in your comment, and will give it due consideration. As it is a guideline, and a user talk page, however, I may spend undue time considering, and little time changing. Unless I can think of anything slightly more droll to put up there. - Tiswas (t) 16:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Service Award
Hi Eddie. Thank you, or gracias, should I say, for giving me the award. I will wear it proudly. ;-) Have a good day. — An as  talk? 21:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah
I have an E-mail account: It is Gmoats2000[at]Yahoo[dot]com, but don;t send me that yet, I hace to get permission. This is not my computer. It's my brother's.

Politics rule 00:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for sticking up for me and believing that all editors should have a voice like me even though I haven't been here long and have been in the middle of so much controversy lately.--William Henry Harrison 00:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

My RFA
Many thanks for your support at my RFA. It ended successfully and I am now a glorified janitor. If I can be of any assistance please don't hesitate to contact me through my talk page. Happy editing! &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  18:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!
Thank you for your welcome message! Geez, that was fast! Are you using a bot? Best regards, Reizende Roel 19:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing!--Thw1309 05:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Canut
I see you marked canut as a CSD, in spite of my clearly marking it as a translation in progress. Please try not to be so hasty next time. - Oreo Priest  20:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)a


 * Fair enough. I would like to commend you on your mature and well-reasoned reply. - Oreo Priest  20:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Editor Review
Hello there, Boricuaeddie. Thanks for the admin coaching tip. I felt however, that I first needed to have a editor review. Can't wait to hear your opinions. --  Random  Say it here! 12:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggestions. I will definitly become more invovled in WikiProjects. I believe Husond already is considering teaching. Refer here for evidence. -- Тλε Rαnδоm Eδι  τ  оr   19:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your Editor Review
I'll visit admin coaching as soon as I figure out how it works.

I'm waiting for your review, thanks! Daniil Maslyuk 15:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry for leaving such a strong warning. Runewiki  777  20:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for wishing me a happy birthday. I really appreciate the sentiment :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt ) 18:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Puerto Rico
Hey! The Puerto Rico Portal page has been revamped with additional content, including a Selected series of Articles, Pictures, and Biographies related to Puerto Rico. However, maintaining a Portal is no easy task. As a member of the WikiProject Puerto Rico, please consider helping out in one of the following tasks:


 * You can add Puerto Rico current events and news to the In the news... section as they occur.
 * You can participate in the discussion of Nominations for content nominated to Selected status.
 * You can nominate content for Selected status in the Nominations page.

Your help and contributions are greatly appreciated. Enjoy the Portal! - Mtmelendez (Talk 03:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This is an automated message for all WikiProject Puerto Rico participants.

An Award!

 * Ahh anyway thanks for the grammer corrections,Take Care- Arnon Chaffin Review me? 15:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hello, Boricuaeddie. Thank you very much for your kind support on my not-so-recent Rfa, it succeeded! I am both thrilled and honoured. Please feel free to yell at me if I ever screw things up =) I hope to live up to your expectations. See you around! Peacent 16:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC) (I'm sorry about this belated thank-you note. I have no I idea why (ahem!) I forgot to thank you earlier, so I just wished to drop by to let you know I really appreciate your support)

Suggestion
Hey. I have not heard from you either for a while. I will remove the Bill Clinton userbox. I got it off someone else's page, and I tell him to remove it. I have not been active on the B-day Committee because I have been doing a lot of studing for exams. I get out of school Friday, and then I will ebcome active. While I have been active on Wikipedia, I ahd to limit some of my Wikipedian things till Friday.

Nice seeing you again,

Politics rule 19:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the happy birthday :) It's great to see people actively promoting WikiLove, I never realised that it feels great to have someone else take time like that. I'm going to join the birthday group (if I can). Again, Thanks! Matt - TheFearow 03:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Attempt at Mediation
Boricuaeddie,

Welcome to the debate. Although I am more than happy to accept objective mediation, no reasons were provided by you as to how the kushan map was indicative of original research. If you would like to mediate, please provide rational provisions for accepting phg's map. His map stands in stark contrast to those composed by authorities here: [].

That link came from the metropolitan museum of art. How do you reconcile that with phg's usage of an amateur website as evidence. That is like citing wikipedia for a serious research paper.

Also, original research means interpreting primary resources or abusing an interpretation. That is what phg did by referencing the rabatak inscripton (a primary source). Moreover, no clear boundaries were provided by that inscription. That is why PHG's map is inaccurate and tantamount to original research.

You attacked me for incivility, but did not take into account user phg's tactics in the past of insulting user vastu and user windy city dude's knowledge of topics. I do believe that amounts to incivility as well.

Please take these points into consideration if you wish to continue the mediation.

Devanampriya 22:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Wow!
Wow! Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!! I never got a barnstar before! YIPPEE!!!!!!!! Haha. Thanks. Ru n e Wi k i      777  23:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I, too, am "wowing," over a birthday message I received from Eddie. Thank you. Wow! Steveo2 19:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Quick Question
Hi Boricuaeddie,

there isn't a usual time, it depends on how much the moderator are busy :). Usually approvals are done every 2-3 days, but I cannot estimate how much does it take from the request from the processing :-(  « Snowolf  How can I help? »  00:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant to say moderators, as I'm not the only one, of course ;-)  « Snowolf  How can I help? »  01:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've approved you. Your 11 under on the general rule of 500 mainspace edits, but looking at your contribs and stuff, i dont think we'll have a problem :) Reedy Boy 10:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Golam Rabbani
I've removed the speedy tag on this article. I've been in long discussions with this editor and a couple of others after I speedy-tagged a bunch of other articles that he posted on Bangladeshi cricket players without that sentence of text. The players are notable as per the standards for cricket players, the single sentence is considered sufficient to stave off speedy deletion per A1/A3, and further content is to be added by Nick mallory as per discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket. Thanks, and take care. -- Finngall  talk  22:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not the one creating the articles, so I'm the wrong one to be admonishing here. I appreciate the enthusiasm (see all of the "Wah! You deleted my article!" messages on my talk page due to all of the speedy-tagging I've done), but I think the tag is unwarranted here. -- Finngall   talk  22:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

As it says in CSD A1 hyperlink on the speedy delete tag "Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context for the article to qualify as a valid stub". As the player only plaid only a few games 1 first class and 3 List A this sentance should be enough to warrant a stub article 02blythed 22:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I have expanded the article. If this is sufficent could you please remove the deletion tag if not could you tell me why. Thanks02blythed 22:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello B. Just to emphasise the point that ALL first class cricketers, by wikipedia policy and precedent, are deemed notable - even if they've only played a few games, even if the newly created article isn't very long and even if they're from Bangladesh. There is lots of statistical information about him in the INFO BOX which is included in the article alongside the initial sentence which asserts the player's notability. You are completely wrong in your judgement here of what constitutes a legitimate article. Nick mallory 02:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The Noblewoman Vera Sheloga‎
Hi, Boricuaeddie. You've put a tag on this article. Is a biography tag appropriate for an article on an opera? Dekkappai 22:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

My Autograph Book
Thanks for signing! Bmg 916 Speak 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

In the news...
Are you kidding? I was hoping that other users would notice and add news. I can only hope that you keep adding!! Thanks. - Mtmelendez (Talk 00:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: welcome
Thanks, but I've been around several years. ;-)   —Randy Johnston (‽) 01:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Whoops
I don't have VP. I put it there when I was a newbie to scare people. I will go remove it right away! Ru n e Wi k i      777  00:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the barnstar and nice vandalism center(its like a more improve verison of mine:D) anyway take Care-  Arnon Chaffin  ( Talk ) 14:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Userpage
Hey Eddie whats happening. Listen, I have my page userpage about where I want it, and would like it if you would drop by, and take a look. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  18:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

No Big Deal
Don't worry about it. It isn't that big of a deal. Thanks! -- ~ Wi ki  her mit  (HermesBot) 04:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the birthday wishes and have a great day! - Patman2648 06:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the birthday wishes! Sorry for not getting back to you until today! No reply is necessary unless you want to. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 17:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)