User talk:AgadaUrbanit/Archives/2010/October

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Golan Heights and vicinity, October 1994.png
A tag has been placed on File:Golan Heights and vicinity, October 1994.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
Have opened discussion here. I want hear other peoples opinions. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 09:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

If I request mediation about the etymology and toponomy, will you accept? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Did not you open this and that. Maybe in sake of clarity of the procedure, we wait and see how those go. Though generally in Wikipedia, more eyeballs better. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 13:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Would you please comment on the Etymology and Geography dispute? --ElComandanteChe (talk) 23:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

GH talk
Thank you for the thought-out answer. I'll replay there tomorrow. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 00:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your turn. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 12:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:EA-287 end.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EA-287 end.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Wosene Kosrof
..ah, I'm not alone. Good. Thanks for the source.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 20:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giora Eiland


The article Giora Eiland has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Kudpung (talk) 07:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Open channel of communication
SD, I don't want to invade into privacy of your talk page, but I still believe an open communication channel is important generally, if we wish to edit same area articles. Just a thought, please consider it. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: 72.13.96.250
Thanks for the note. You are right - it's clearly the same person as before. However, I happened to be on a wikibreak, and the vandal went dormant again. So, nothing to be done at the moment. Drop me a note if you see him again.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)