User talk:AgadaUrbanit/Archives/2012/June

Your evidence at the Falung Gong 2 arbitration case
Your evidnce at the Falung Gong 2 arbitration case focuses primarily on content, rather than conduct. The Arbitration Committee does not rule and content, and the scope of the case is to review conduct issues. Could you therefore please refactor your evidence to concentrate purely on behavioural issues, and substantiate these with diffs. Finally, you mention that you have commented at Arbitration Enforcement: could you please provide links for reference? Thanks. --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I hope I could find some time tomorrow, I know my evidence is a good example of WP:IAR format wise. Thank you for your query, Alexandr Dmitri. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)