User talk:Againme/Archive 1

Early Edition character article expansion
Thanks for contacting me on my talk page about expanding the article about Early Edition characters. It's great to see a fellow wikipedian interested in improving info about the show. To give you some background, I created the character list because I wanted to emulate the quality work and formatting done on the Prison Break wikipedia page. Unfortunately, I've neglected Early Edition while I've been attempting to raise Ozzie Smith to featured article status. Please feel free to expand the characters list as you see fit, and I'll try to work on it too after I get the episode list finished. Happy editing! Monowi (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "A girl who spreads light"
A page you created, A girl who spreads light, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 17:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "A story writer on the crucifix"
A page you created, A story writer on the crucifix, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 17:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

the Category "Disambiguation" is not what you think
Thanks for your work creating Dab pages. But please don't tag them as you have been: you'll see, if you look at Category:Disambiguation, that it is not intended for Dab pages. Please use Disambig instead, which puts them in Category:Disambiguation pages where they belong, and explains to users what in the world the page is there for. Thanks, and i hope you'll continue paying attention to the need for Dab'n! --Jerzy•t 19:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Re "Task done!":  Now, that's a cool thing to have under your belt! I didn't look far, but the first thing i happened on is that that would include Christian Democratic Party (El Salvador), which has a Set Index Article at what Christian Democratic Party Rdr's to. I suppose in that case you found no task beyond looking to see it was done? Curious if you have any observations abt the SIA aspect of the matter. --Jerzy•t 22:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the thot; i think i got them all. --Jerzy•t 19:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Funny you should ask: i was thinking yesterday about whether for instance Berlin, NH and Berlin, N.H. are redirects. I think for most editors with the interest, it's worth brainstorming about such classes of article that make the Rdrs  likely to be valuable, and focusing on one where they find the subject matter interesting, so that it exposes you to articles on topics that you're interested in, presenting opportunities for mixing the Rdr work with article editing.   In another direction, i frequently listen to NPR while editing, and stop to key in names of people i hear mentioned, to see if their bio exists. Usually it does, but often i've misspelled the name, or under- or over-abbreviated the article title. I always create a Rdr for my first few guesses, and often try to anticipate other readers' first few guesses, and create the missing ones. You'll see my response (intentionally not completely exhaustive) to an extreme case, in my contribs last weekend. --Jerzy•t 20:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Monitoring short pages
the template longcomment is used by a patrolling editor after verifying that the short page being patrolled is OK. Short pages are often created along the lines of "She's my girlfriend and she's great." Many of those are caught by new page patrollers, some are not. The short page patrollers make quick work of those, but also short articles and dab pages or attempts at redirects end up being fixed and monitored and the template is added to that we don't have to look at the same stuff over and over again. Generally, you don't add it to your own work, you let someone else add it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Article names
Hello Againme, I do not think that you recent moves of various articles about Quebec political parties is consistent with Naming conventions. I have explained my reasons at Talk:Rally for National Independence. I ask that you stop moving any more articles until this is resolved. Further, I propose to undo all of these moves, but I would like to hear your comments on the issue first. Thank you. Regards, Ground Zero | t 18:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

names
hi. you might be interested in the ongoing naming debate at Talk:GPV, --Soman (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixing your mistakes
As explained at Talk:Rally for National Independence, you have made numerous page moves of articles relating to Quebec political parties that violate Wikipedia style. please correct your mistakes, rather than leaving them for other people to clean up. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 00:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I have now undone all of the damage that you did and that you refused to clean up yourself. In the future, please do not take up other Wikipedians' time by recklessly making page moves. Ignorance of Wikipedia style and rules does not justify vandalism of this sort. Ground Zero | t 05:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Just and edit to clarify that there was no vandalism or damaging going on from my part.--Againme (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * From years of contributions I've seen here, I have great respect for Ground Zero. Vandalism is too strong a term, for me, at this point but I do see his point that upon being informed that such translations are inappropriate and counter to the conventions at Wikipedia, you seemed intransigent about reverting. It seems that you continue to make such translations in other areas as well. If an organisation or other entity is primarily known in English under a foreign language name, it should be found under that name. To create a translation of that name and put the article there, is worse still. I trust, however, that you will refrain from such bold moves and seek to establish a consensus for such changes in the future. Best regards, Double Blue  (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Friendliness
Yes, I am in favour of the independence of Quebec, and in general all peoples on Earth if that is their will. -- Mathieugp (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Good idea. We shall all be our own country. :-P Double Blue  (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh my!!!! We English are surrounded! lol :) --Againme (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Pronunciation
I guess there are local variables on pronunciation that have nothing to do with the language used. "Houston" is pronounced "house-ton" in Georgia, and correctly. "Thames" is pronounced with the "Th" in Newport, RI, though it is English, and that is correct. No apologies need be made for either pronunciation. So maybe it has nothing to do with the language used. The point is, in an English version of Wikipedia, I don't have to be apologetic about pronouncing the word the way the locals do, which differs from the way the Spanish people now speak that same word. Pronunciation changes over time. There is no way anyone can prove that our pronunciation did not originally match the Spanish which may nave changed. Nor in the Spanish version of Wikipedia, should editors feel necessary to explain that the way they pronounce some word taken from English, "in Spanish." Of course, it is in Spanish! It is their encyclopedia! They only need take care that the pronunciation is accurate for Spaniards. If they pronounce "Lake George" (New York) as "Lake Horhay", that is fine with me as long as it suits most Spaniards. No apologies necessary. Student7 (talk) 18:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer.


 * I am curious how we know that Spanish is pronounced the same today as it was centuries ago. We know English, for example was spoken so differently from Shakespeare's time to Pope's, that if it were not for the latter, Shakespeare would have been forgotten. Then there's Chaucer. And Johnson's dictionary freezing the spelling just as the pronunciation changed much to pupils everlasting dismay to the present day. Student7 (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Nor am I a linguist. But vowel pronunciation change. The worst is Arabic. I heven't heard of any language that changes that rapidly. But all change. Well maybe not Slavic since they consist of "all" consonants!  :)  Student7 (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, about fairies
Your question about fairies, the following are unexplained

The Dorothy Inman photo, here: http://www.lavendise.com/photos/fairy8.jpg

There's more, I just have to find it. Thanks. Please leave my edit to the list of cryptids page as is. Thanks again.

--Isshii (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

hi
--Soman (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Reply
Yep, I've known about that category for awhile. :-) Khoikhoi 20:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Dougofborg(talk) 11:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Interesting
I'm writing here so we don't stray too off-topic on the article talkpage. Well, I used to work in a media as well, but I stopped for a while in order to finish my education. Now, I can understand your concerns, but you really put them in an awful manner to start with. If I have to give my personal view, I'd say media are manipulating no matter if they talk about 1 or 1 mil. victims. But then again - every single life is precious and every single death - tragic. In that line of thought (the one that you should care only when the victims are more than a certain number) is not really humane. In this particular case, besides wiki rules and broad coverage of the subject by international media, you have two more factors, that you might have not been aware of. One the "National mourning" day (which happens to be today btw) and the fact that this accident can have great political and social consequences in the country. With European and national elections coming up this might be a deciding factor. But, nevermind, I'm glad we settled this and I'm open if you wish to discuss any media theories, obscurities etc. Cheers. -- L a v e o l  T 21:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

your message
Hello! wow I didn't realize that it was near that many! I thought only 21-23,000 Taliban and other forces were killed in Afghanistan? --98.156.123.135 (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh that's right. I was forgetting about those captured.  Umm the DOD may have a lit on that.  Their site is pretty much the best when it comes to what's going on militarily in Afghanistan and Iraq. --98.156.123.135 (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Reply
The nested parameter seen on a lot of talk pages is not used in the template. I have not found its definition and so have not removed it when I have come across it.  Blind Eagle  talk ~ contribs  21:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

socialist vs communist?
Hi Againme. I finally understood your point. I've worked as an editor and writer with Petroni for a long time. We 99.9% of the time use socialist instead of Communist because we feel that that most people associate the word with Stalinism, Maoism and the Soviet Block, USSR, and Red China. Yes we are communists, but rhetoric style changes a bit with the times. Could have said revolutionary Marxist, for the sake of brevity, use socialist and thanks to the McCain, more people are wondering what the word means. Ciao4Now Gino5950 (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Elephanstay question
yes it does mean american dollars, I got the Thai baht number and converted it then rounded it :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack Condie (talk • contribs) 05:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I'm sorta new to this so thanks for improving it --Jack Condie (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan
I wanted to tell you that I removed the infobox from the article, it has no place there, that infobox is specificly for the main article of the war. Also, check other lists of casualties of wars like: List of insurgent fatality reports in Iraq, or List of security forces fatality reports in Iraq, or List of security forces fatality reports in Afghanistan. We don't put infoboxes in those kinds of articles.

Also, the name of the article is List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan. Like the article says - This is a partial list of insurgents killed in the War in Afghanistan. Please don't add the Pakistani Taliban deaths to the list, those are casualties inflicted in a separate war. If you want you can create an article called List of insurgent fatality reports in Pakistan and that can be used in the main article of the War in Pakistan. Hope you listen to my advice friend. Cheers!89.216.234.187 (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes I am an established user, I have been working on Wikipedia for almost three years now, it is just that I change my ip every few days. I was the one who actualy created that article you are working on. You may see the war in Pakistan as the same one in Afghanistan, and in essence I agree with you, I totaly agree with you. But those two conflicts are treated as separate wars, one fought between the Afghan branch of the Taliban and NATO and one fought between the Pakistan branch of the Taliban and the Pakistani government. There exist two articles on Wikipedia, War in Afghanistan (2001-) and War in Northwest Pakistan. So my suggestion is this. Again, the name of the article is List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan not Pakistan. I suggest you start an article called List of insurgent fatality reports in Pakistan. I will even help you expand that new article. And then we can use the number we come up with in this new article as a source for the overall number of Pak Taliban killed in the war in Pakistan. What do you say? Is it a deal?89.216.234.187 (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Please note that in their above post, this IP editor has just admitted being the indefinitely blocked editor User:Top Gun (User:BobaFett85 who created the List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan article is one of the many sock puppet accounts they've used to try to evade their block). I would suggest that you ignore their attempt to recruit you as a meatpuppet. regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I didn't lie to you, I was a well known and established user for more than two years up until 10 months ago. Then I was indefinetly blocked by a user with whom I didn't agree on how to construct the South Ossetia war article. He used as an excuse a copy-paste violation, I copy-pasted a text from a news article so I could reword it later on. He used the fact that in my early days as an editor when I still didn't understand the rules I copy-pasted a lot. After I was explained that rule I didn't do it again for more than a year and a half except in that one instant. After that I didn't use registered nicknames anymore. Most administrators knew it was me but let me continue editing because I didn't do any disruptive edits. Then about two months ago I came into conflict with user Nick-D on how to construct the article American forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan, since he found out I was as a registered user an indefinetly baned user he, and only he, started hounding me like I'm an escaped convict to block me at every turn. I have only tried to update numbers of casualties from wars, with references, and have not done any disruptive edits. His accusation that I tried to make you a meatpuppet is unfounded. I only tried to make to you a suggestion on how we can make a specific distinction between the number of Taliban killed in Afghanistan and the number killed in Pakistan. That is all.89.216.236.242 (talk) 18:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Listen, when I said established I ment, I edited Wikipedia for a long time, not that I am respected. I didn't try to deceive you.89.216.236.242 (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Here's a gesture of good faith on my part. This reference provides the complete number of militants killed in Pakistan by year since 2003, you can use it in the new article. Only 2009 is not included. You could use for 2009 the fact that 1,500 have died in Black Thunderstorm, at least according to the military.89.216.236.242 (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, autoboti@yahoo.com, what can I say, loved the Transformers when I was a kid.89.216.236.242 (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I was directing the 'meat puppet' term at Top Gun, not you - I suggested that you ignore their attempt (which is related to them trying to evade their indef block) rather that you were in any way a puppet. No offense intended. I'm neither American nor the person who originally blocked Top Gun (and most of their block evading sockpuppet accounts) by the way. Nick-D (talk) 01:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note that I have raised Top Gun's conduct and your creation of the article they requested at Administrators' noticeboard. Nick-D (talk) 01:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Pic on Elephantstay
Um Can you clean up the elephantstay article i tried to put a pic but its not in the right place --Jack Condie (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan
Please do not remove tags from articles without first addressing the issues they raise like you did in this edit. Please also note that tags saying that the article is semi-protected should not be removed as you also did in that edit, and removing the tag doesn't remove the protection. Nick-D (talk) 04:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Việt Võ Đạo
Hello Againme

You moved Việt Võ Đạo to Việt-Võ-Đạo. Is there a reason why you did this ? A quick websearch shows that the common spelling is Việt Võ Đạo (without the dashes).

Thomas (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Settler (Asimov)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Settler (Asimov), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Spacer_(Asimov). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Chat
Sure. Lampman (talk) 15:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Atmospheric beast


The article Atmospheric beast has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Links appear to be unreliable at best, possible spam. No scientific evidence, no mainstream literary reference, not one scientific article or journal publication, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 16:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Atmospheric beast
I have nominated Atmospheric beast, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Atmospheric beast. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * We won! haha! --Againme (talk) 17:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Sovereign states
Hey, I was referring to sovereign states that are not universally recognised by other states (also on the same article). Also getting too specific in the lead may not be desirable. The lead should be a general summary and more specific content can be placed in the article. Anyway, it seems you did it in good faith and I am pretty much indifferent about the change. Poliphile (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Reports of black cougars in England
Hello Againme, In April you created the redirect targeting a section that was added by an IP user and added to by another. The material was never sourced and after sitting with a tag for a couple of months it was removed.
 * → Black panther

Unless you have some sourced material you wish to add to the article, this redirect now appears useless and misleading. As the author, you can avoid WP:RFD via WP:CSD, tagging it with, perhaps,. What do you think? -- ToET 09:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and the same applies for: -- ToET 09:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * → Black panther
 * → Black panther

Re Tunicate
my 11 year old son has been on my account again. He is very into these things, he probably found it in Scientific American or something. I shall get him to do the reference.--Streona (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Huay chivo
Hi Againme,

Just a note on your recent move of the Huay chivo page - it is not a proper name, rather a description of a class of supernatural beings/sorcerers, literally witch-goat, and was correct as was. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Paramount Leader?
Hey. I saw you added a bunch of text to two articles about Kim Jong-Il being declared the "Paramount Leader" of North Korea in the new constitution. But all the sources I've found say "Supreme Leader." Can you point me to some of your sources? &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just for clarification, I found this NYT article, which says "has officially made Kim Jong-il its 'supreme leader' ... The new Constitution defined one of several titles Mr. Kim holds, chairman of the National Defense Commission, as 'supreme leader' of the country." And this BBC article, which says "For the first time, the constitution refers to him implicitly as 'supreme leader'." A Google news search doesn't find any recent hits for "North Korea" and "paramount leader." &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Youth of MPLA
I agree it is not a party in and of itself, the stub is by far the closest proper one. Do you know a closer one?--TM 21:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Dündar Aliosman
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dündar Aliosman. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It's referenced now. --Againme (talk) 18:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I never touched the rap article. 76.239.23.133 (talk) 23:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your post on my talk page
Weird. All I was trying to do was mathify "6.25×1018", musta done something funky with find/replace and not realized it. Thanks for the catch. Erie lhonan  18:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of insurgent fatality reports in Afghanistan. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * We won! --Againme (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Tiered warning system
It worked, but... :)  Hello.  Maybe you didn't know, but there is a tiered system of warning templates that you can use to warn vandals.  The tier system starts with gentle nudges and proceeds to more stern messages.  Using that system is so effective that most vandals stop long before the fourth warning.  There are three additional benefits to using that system.  The first, and most important, is that the wording of the lower level warnings are not so stern that they encourage more vandalism.  Many will stop vandalizing after one or two warnings and may actually return to make positive contributions to Wikipedia.  Secondly, many administrators prefer to see that a vandal had plenty of warning before blocking them. Once a vandal has had four warnings and continues to vandalize, then any administrator is fully justified in blocking the offending vandal. Finally, some popular vandal-fighting scripts are programmed to recognize standard warning templates left on a talk page and automatically apply the next-higher warning. If someone has used a personalized warning, the script doesn't recognize this and starts with the level 1 warning. This in effect lets the vandal get away with five warnings, instead of four, before being blocked. Oh, and the real reason to use the templates -- they're faster to use. Less typing. For instance, to warn a first offender, all you have to type is and the software does the rest for you. You don't even have to remember the formats of the different templates. A handy reference page for warning templates has been created at WP:WARN. Thank you for your vandal-fighting efforts. Hopefully this will make placing appropriate warnings easier and quicker for you. Take care and happy editing! 152.16.16.75 (talk) 11:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL! Hey, your message worked, didn't it?  :)  Still, the tiered system is easier and quicker to use, and even lets you include a link to the page that was vandalized.  Its up to you whether or not you use the templates, but once you get used to them, they are soooo helpful.  Happy editing!  152.16.16.75 (talk) 11:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Block evasion
Please don't give block evaders a hand as you did in this edit (knowingly according to your edit summary). Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Mail
Did you get my e-mail I sent you? About that security forces article?89.216.234.244 (talk) 07:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, see the message right above yours... --Againme (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

"Communist" in quotations
I noticed that you changed "Communist" to "communist" in Mass killings under Communist regimes. This may be in line with MOS in many cases, but in quotations, I think we have to accurately quote, so "Communist" should stay "Communist" where the person being quoted wrote "Communist." Could you check all the quotes, or change them back? Thanks. Smallbones (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Taliban active fighters strength
On 3 March 2010, US estimate that 36,000 Afghan taliban militants are active in Afghanistan. These are some links.

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/International/03-Mar-2010/MajorGeneral-Richard-Barrons-puts-Taliban-fighter-numbers-at-36000-report

http://www.upiasia.com/Top_News/US/2010/03/03/Taliban-fighters-estimated-at-36000/UPI-67591267620358/

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/03/03/Taliban-fighters-estimated-at-36000/UPI-67591267620358/

I think that first one link is best.Because The Nation newspaper is Pakistan's most popular newspaper and its also too much femous on internet.

Update the talibans strength and total strength of all militants which is 98,100 total militants in war in afghanistan article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_%282001%E2%80%93present%29119.152.29.16 (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Coalition Casualties Update
http://www.icasualties.org/OEF/Index.aspx

1707 killed(US:1032, UK: 279, Others: 396)

8,938+ wounded(US: 5,393, UK: 3,545 )  119.152.83.251 (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Please update war in Afghanistan(2001-present) article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_%282001%E2%80%93present%29

Stating the obvious?
Hoi. Was it really unclear to anyone that it means nearest from Earth? What else could it possibly have meant? Best regards, --Thogo (Talk) 00:01, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

(copied from my tp) ''Well, we do it a lot in Wikipedia, and I think is healthy. :) --Againme (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)''


 * Hm, well... I prefer to have only necessary information, but that's probably more a cultural difference. :p --Thogo (Talk) 19:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

OOPart
The reorganization looks fine to me - I wonder how long before somebody objects to the "fringe" terminology! - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Moving big rocks
Hi, Veeeeery interesting question, isn't it? The Romans managed to move a 300+ ton obelisk (in one piece? I must ask) by barge to Rome. WP's now got a picture of what it took to set up in 1586AD (Saint_Peter's_Square). The obelisk article says that took "nearly 1000 men, 140 carthorses, 47 cranes." But when bigshots give orders, stuff moves. Oh, and it had to be exorcised first. Moving stuff 3 times that size 1000 years earlier? Since I'm an amateur, I might guess about wheels, since they'd been around since 3000BC. But that might upset many old guys with beards, and people who dream of levitation. Twang (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Jose Rodriguez/José Rodríguez
Hello, Againme.

I see that you moved "Jose Rodriguez (intelligence)" to "José Rodríguez (intelligence)".

Although the new spelling is certainly the usual one in Spanish, and he was born in Puerto Rico, it is also the case that he lives in the United States, and that many residents of the United States drop the diacritics from their names.

As you probably know, Wikipedia policies and guidelines direct us to use the most common names in English-language sources. At least per Google, that's actually the old title, without diacritics.

So I guess it comes down to how he prefers to write his name. Do you have evidence of which form he uses? SamEV (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your response.

I hope you can see the wisdom of Wikipedia's simple rule. By accepting the predominant spelling in English-language sources, whether the verdict of the sources turns out to be wrong or right, ultimately, at least we can show we followed an objective and logical rule. (And remember: each Wikipedia has its own rules.) [And in any case where the personal choice is known, and by our respecting it, we] don't have to guess whether someone is spelling his/her name without diacritics due to [conscious] choice, simple carelessness, or lack of education—It becomes something with which we don't have to concern ourselves. And as for applying the rules of orthography over the personal choices of individuals: how defensible is that, really?

Maybe the thing to do should be to search websites that display scans of material that originally appeared in printed form, for example, Google Books, as well as newspaper and magazine websites. Printed sources tend to have no problem with special characters, so at those websites we get to see the spellings originally used in the printed versions. I suppose that most personal names have appeared in more than a few printed sources, so this should work for most names.

What do you think about that idea? SamEV (talk) 23:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [modified 00:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)]

Hi! "In conclusion: maybe your proposal is the best available in our unperfect world, but I fear that it could lead to supress most accent marks in names" You don't have to worry about that, because we'll only use sources that do use diacritics. That way, we can have a high degree of certainty that if a name appears without diacritics in those sources, it's because it's not supposed to [have them], not because they don't use them at all. I propose that we start assembling a list of high quality newspapers and magazines, to go along with Google Books. What do you think? In fact, we could use sources that are online only, if they also tend to use diacritics. Obviously, we should do this randomly. I.e., we should not search for "José Rodríguez" in a particular source before we decide to add that source to the list, lest we rig the outcome, right? Instead, we should test each source with names that we're not considering in regards to article titles. We might ask a third person to suggest such names. Your thoughts? SamEV (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC) [modified 04:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)]

Hey, I should be getting more work done myself! I think the most objective way to compile the list should be to simply grab the list of the top sources by circulation. For example, the top 10 newspapers and the top 10 magazines, in terms of circulation. If any newspaper in the top 10 doesn't use diacritics, we examine the 11th on the list. If it doesn't either, we look at the 12th, and so on, until we have the 10 highest-circulation newspapers that use diacritics. Likewise with the magazines. WP has lists of circulation. Check out List of newspapers in the world by circulation and List of magazines by circulation. Many of those non-US sources are in English, and for the sake of a worldwide perspective I guess we ought to have some of them on our list. So, if circulation is OK with you, let me know and I'll compile the list, which you should be able to verify. If you want to suggest a different criterion or method, please do! SamEV (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

How's it going?

BTW, you may have noticed that using a pre-existing list removes the need for a third party to suggest test names. SamEV (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Oopart redux
I was just tweaking Oopart, and had to come here and say - boy, that article is w-a-a-a-a-a-y better now that you've reorganized it. Pat yourself on the back and give yourself a cigar. Nice job, indeed. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Arab citizens of Israel
Please read the first footnote, and related source. "The Israeli Nationality Law came into effect on 14 July 1952. Between Israel's declaration of independence on 14 May 1948 and the passage of this bill four years later, there technically were no Israeli citizens. In this article, the term "Arab citizen" is used to refer to the Arab population in Israel, even in the period after the 1949 armistice agreement and before the passage of the Nationality Law in 1952." This makes it clear that the phrase is commonly, and deliberately, used to refer to people who were residents but not citizens; Israeli Jews, too, were technically not citizens in this period. RolandR (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages
Hello, please do not edit other users' comments on the talk pages. You are welcome to copy edit in every article, but entries on a talk page should not be changed without the author's consent. Thank you, –Holt (T•C) 08:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

New Template

 * Hello my fellow Wikipedians, I recently succeeded in getting some photos released into the public domain from the Puerto Rican State Historic Preservation Office and created the template for such images, upon User:Quazgaa's request. See:Good news. The template which I created to be used on the images from the Puerto Rican State Historic Preservation Office is the following: Tony the Marine (talk) 07:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Critic to page moving
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Harthacnut, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Newsweek
Hello. This piece is about the American newsweekly. It has one bureau in Buenos Aires. (Frankly, it wouldn't want to shell out the money for two.) I know because I was formerly a bureau chief for TIME magazine, and had a number of friends at Newsweek. I'll see if I can find you a source online. MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay, that's pretty funny actually. I've had some friends who've left there fairly recently after coming over from TIME. I also have a couple friends still there. I wasn't surprised by the sale, obviously, as that had been telegraphed, but I must say that the sale price was pretty astounding. Hard to watch what's happening in the world of print journalism these days..... Take care. MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Spanish profanity
Please use WP:RS citations to this article and see WP:V. moreno oso (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Spanish profanity. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Additionally, please read WP:NPA: comment on edits and not editors. --moreno oso (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I did not add anything!!! --Againme (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Spanish profanity. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 15:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no controversy. This article has standed without references for this word for years.--Againme (talk) 15:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people&#32;as you did at Spanish profanity‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''Your edit summaries are very uncivil. I suggest you provide standard edit summaries.'' --moreno oso (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * For the record, I don't understand why this user continues to make threats in my Talk Page. I'm not personally attacking anyone (I did advice him not to be a zealot). Please see Harassment. --Againme (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello, Againme.
 * This is in regards to Spanish profanity. I just want to remind you that when challenged to source content that you add, you should do so, rather than insisting it stay simply because there's other unsourced content in the article. The previous content is by no means safe from challenge, but at least it forms part of the article's stable version.
 * Anyway, thank you for adding the source, and good luck. SamEV (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Hi!
The short answer is that every usage of a non-free image must confirm with our non-free content criteria, and the basic objection here is criterion 8. While an image of a cryptid does add significantly to the article on the cryptid and can probably be used (provided it meets the other criteria), there is a longstanding consensus that using non-free content to identify/illustrate entries in lists like that does not meet NFCC#8. We also have this guideline on non-free content in lists, but that doesn't really apply to a list of this sort. Basically, that list article should only use free images. J Milburn (talk) 18:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

care to mentor a couple of my students?
Hi! Ive noticed some of your editing on Mexico-related articles Ive worked on... and your userpage. I am an English teacher in Mexico City. I'm teaching a very advanced Business English class this semester and Im going to have my students do some work in WP. I did something similar a couple of years ago. Im looking for people to adopt one or two of my "kids" and give them some help, mostly with navigating WP and some with their English. Please let me know if you can help out and thanks in advance! Thelmadatter (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * wow that was fast.... no problem. thanks anywayThelmadatter (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

List of scientific Misanthropes
First. Thank you for your corrections.

I always expect my edits to be treated in a Mythanthropic (misanthropic) manner which can lead to many Mythunderstandings (misunderstandings).

It seems that we have our own crypto-puzzle to sort out here. Or should we leave it to the realms of the Mythtaken (mistaken) people who believe that Mythakes (mistakes) are not possible on such a well known and well travelled site such as one with these themyths. (themes - I know, it's crap but it kinda fits).

Ok. Is this a genuine error or should I get all mythty-eyed (misty-eyed) over an Easter Bunny waiting to hatch.

Seriously, I'd like to know. And again, thank you for your corrections. I spend a lot of time trying to find non-crypto refs (news reports and the like) so a few things pass me by. With all of our combined efforts, we can make this a viable portal again. Angry Mustelid (talk) 23:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC).

definitely disappointed in the mythtical properties of wikipedia Angry Mustelid (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you look at the coding of the message and click the links you will get the idea. If you type 'mis' as Myth then finish the word (such as mistaken - mythtaken) it fills the whole thing in as the link leading to the Myth page. I have filled in the words above.
 * (it works with dis as well. Disappointed - maybe, suprised definitely).

Click the following Wikilinks.
 * Spanish
 * Italian
 * Portugese
 * then click these:


 * Spanish
 * Italian
 * Portugese
 * Sorry, but I can't really make it any clearer than that. Angry Mustelid (talk) 20:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your user page / Categories
I've tweaked your user page to allow a link to the categories you created. This has shown that four of them have been deleted. It's fine to create categories, but then they must be used or they can be liable to deletion. Such deletion does not prejudice re-creation if the cat is going to be used on redirects. If you don't like the display of the redlinks, please feel free to revert my edit without further reference to myself. It's your user page, after all. Mjroots2 (talk) 07:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Facíl
Stub categories don't count as an article being categorized, because the stub templates are temporary maintenance categories that are meant to be removed from the article as soon as it's passed stub length. An article is considered to be uncategorized if it isn't in at least one permanent topic category in addition to the stub template(s). Bearcat (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

en-dashes
You have misunderstood. The following are different things:
 * A - B
 * A – B
 * A – B

If you click on "edit", you will see that NEITHER of them is "spelled out". The first is a hyphen. The second is an en-dash. WP:MOS says the en-dash rather than the hyphen is to be used in certain contexts. Thus
 * John Xmith (1842-1915)

is wrong, but
 * John Xmith (1842–1915)

is right. You can achieve the second form either by spelling out the word endash preceded by an ampersand and followed by a hyphen, or else by using the version you see here that's not "spelled out". Either way, the hyphen, which is shorter than an en-dash, is incorrect. In Ogopogo, I changed a hyphen to an en-dash. 24.118.123.34 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

John IV of France listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John IV of France. Since you had some involvement with the John IV of France redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Early Asimov
I noticed you seem to have removed the merge tag from the most (all?) of the articles that are being discussed at Talk:The Early Asimov. You might want to replace them so that others will be aware of the discussion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Burkinabe
Hello, I see you've been changing a lot of Burkinabè to Burkinabé. Is the former actually a misspelling? I had understood (and by no means am I an expert) that it was a variation. Compare, for example and  (and try not to be too disturbed that Wikipedia turns up in google news results!) -- Beloved  Freak  21:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive invitation
Guoguo12 --Talk--  16:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Winston's Hiccup
Winston's Hiccup in this wiki article is most likely located in Jordan's southeast (or east-southeast) because there is also an online article mention of Wadi Sirhan--that lies in Saudi Arabia. The Hiccup supposedly created a large triangle shaped area of Saudi territory and this is where Southwest Jordan is located. Frankly, this is one of the strange ways that the colonial powers drew the map in the 19th and 20th century.


 * The British united Arab North Sudan and African South Sudan before giving Sudan independence in 1956 and only now is that mess being fixed after decades of civil war and civilian deaths. The Arabs and black Africans never liked each other in the first place. Iraq is another artificial British creation with Sunni, Shiite Arabs and Kurds unhappily living together.

With best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Bolivian Trotskyists
Hi. The OST, PST and MST are just different names of different stages of history of the same. Thus a link from MST article to the OST article, rather than going through with merger, becomes a circular reference. Regarding names, please check and give input at Naming conventions (political parties). I think it is important to have somewhat consequent naming schemes (like "SWP"="PST"), rather than exact translations. --Soman (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

palestine election
i just quoted the source, thought that one came otu later (seemed direct from the the PLO). but change if you must. also see national electoral calendar 2011(Lihaas (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)).
 * like kosovo and the ICJ rule. 1. delcared independance, 2. reconigised by over 100 states.Lihaas (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * that make sense
 * your explanation says " "no later than september", in Spanish, antes del fin de septiembre, in Italian, entro September." entierh of the sources mention octover that is the definition of WP:SYnthesis and WP:ORLihaas (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ?Lihaas (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Infobox
Well, I deleted infobox from List of Beys of Tunis because the same infobox already exist on article Bey of Tunis. I think it's not nessecary on both places. If you want to restore it, go ahead. I think it's really not a big thing. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Date
Unless I'm mistaken, we don't have a date. It may be held in 2011 or 2012. When we do not know which year, the standard is just to call it the "Next fooian election". Cheers, Number   5  7  15:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It may be held within the next year, but we don't know when - we do not name articles based on either/or situations (otherwise the Next United Kingdom general election would be United Kingdom general election, 2011/2012/2013/2014/2015 as it may be in any of those years). Number   5  7  15:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Viking Age
Just so you know, the reversion of your "proper edit" to Viking Age (the ndash) was unintentional and likely due to how Wikipedia handles edit conflicts. My apologies.  Alphathon  /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ ( talk ) 15:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Moving articles
Hello Againme, how are you? I have written hundreds of Hispanic and Puerto Rican related articles, among them Antonio Valero de Bernabé. If you need any help in moving an article such as was the case of "Valero de Bernabé", let me know in my "talk page" and I'll do it. It would be much faster then putting in a request. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I was an active Marine from 69-75 (4 yrs. in the reserves), but you know the old saying "Once a Marine, always a Marine" (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Diacritics
Morning, dear Againme, have you notice the diference between the [|before] and after you "corrected" this article? I will help you, links. I have seeen you are redirecting the "incorrects" articles, and I hope you will do the same with all those article appearing now as red links. Oscar 14:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Be aware of this: In this article you "repaired" the Eduardo Concepcion link, but I would like to know if you are going to repair [] (the others) as well, and the same with every single repaired link, even if red linked. Oscar 14:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Spaces
Hi!

This Your edit gives me the hope that there might be a way to automatically remove superfluous blank spaces. Is that so, and if yes, what is the way? --Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * There has just begun a little discussion on spaces here, on the Manual of Style talk page. --Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 20:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Take care, the link seems to direct to the very last contribution of the Manual of Style talk page, now, for some reason. You`d have to scroll up. --Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 20:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 21:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Moving issues
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hot Stop (t) 21:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not able to locate the related ANI thread for some reason, but your move of Raúl Ibañez to Raúl Ibáñez was wrong and contravened the discussion on the talk page. Sources show Ibanez with two diacritics in his name, not three (see here and here), and in Spanish, the "á" accent on the penultimate syllable isn't necessary because the second-to-last syllable is already accented without it. Please do not move that page again without first undertaking and completing discussion about the topic. Thank you. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  21:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi! It was my misktake. I apologize. It won't happen again. Againme (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Referencing
Please provide citations for anything you want to include, and don't remove information that has been cited. Everyking (talk) 21:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Western Shara List of positions
Hello,

Template:Western Sahara lists of positions is being considered for deletion. Your input would be appreciated at this template entry in the templates for discussions page.

Best regards Tachfin (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

???
Huh? I don't understand... please explain this to me on my talk. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah Try purging the file. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Redirects from Portuguese-language terms
Category:Redirects from Portuguese-language terms, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 15:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

talkback - 24 August 2011
96.232.126.111 (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Broken rifle
A tag has been placed on Broken rifle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Shikkui, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Japanese and Antifungal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Copy-edit
Hi, may I request that you copy-edit these following articles: Thank you (149.151.144.42 (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC))
 * Khilji dynasty
 * Khusro Khan
 * Ochre Coloured Pottery culture
 * Gandhara grave culture

House of Knýtlinga
Hey, just saw your article. You should join the project. Thanks, from OKelly (talk) 09:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Pero (beverage)


A tag has been placed on Talk:Pero (beverage), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

talkpage of redirect, marked by wikiproject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind talk  19:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Would You like to Help?
Hi, I am starting WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the []. McKinseies (talk) 15:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March copy edit drive
and concluding with current pope Xxxxx, a pope described in the prophecy as "Peter the Roman",

Proposed deletion of Либерално-Демократска Партија


The article Либерално-Демократска Партија has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * DAB page with implausible title for English language Wikipedia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Haruth (talk) 02:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. When you recently edited List of cryptids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merpeople (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Alice Sanger listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alice Sanger. Since you had some involvement with the Alice Sanger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 66.214.40.255 (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Damián Fernández Beanato
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. PeterCantropus (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Damián Fernández Beanato listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Damián Fernández Beanato. Since you had some involvement with the Damián Fernández Beanato redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). PeterCantropus (talk) 05:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Damián Beanato
A tag has been placed on Damián Beanato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damián A. Fernández Beanato
A tag has been placed on Damián A. Fernández Beanato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damián Fernández
A tag has been placed on Damián Fernández, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damian Fernandez Beanato
A tag has been placed on Damian Fernandez Beanato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damian Fernandez
A tag has been placed on Damian Fernandez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damian Beanato
A tag has been placed on Damian Beanato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Damian A. Fernandez Beanato
A tag has been placed on Damian A. Fernandez Beanato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hola
Sos tan boludo que me muero. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Hi!
You're welcome, I was fixing the links to articles I'd had moved and just made a few changes when I saw them. -- xensyria T 00:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Damián Alejandro Fernández Beanato listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Damián Alejandro Fernández Beanato. Since you had some involvement with the Damián Alejandro Fernández Beanato redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). PeterCantropus (talk) 22:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Moved to my User page! Thanks! --Againme (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Idem! Thanks again! --Againme (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark of Ephesus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Russell Harley


The article Russell Harley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cloudz 679 12:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helicopter hieroglyphs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abydos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)