User talk:Againstpropaganda

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kizil Caves, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Kizil Caves. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Do not use Wikipedia to soapbox or promote your point of view. '' Biker Biker (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Kizil Caves, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Biker Biker (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Kizil Caves has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Dear Sir I never thought telling the truth is a vandalism! If so what is saying that the czves were made from the Uighur Turks is? If not a distortion and a falsification of historical truth? And I ask you why you don t put on the article you by yourself who made the caves? I ask you Sir who made the caves? Who is depicted on the fresco? Why are the faces of the frescos vandalized? Sir the onwers and the fabricators of the caves were the Tocharian people! That s the truth and I was editing the article in writting the truth! And I thought that wikipedia was all about the truth!!!! As you know the region of the now called Turkestan is a region once called Tarim Basin and the homeland of the Tocharians a nation of caucausian origin now extinct. That is the exact words written by me in the editing! Were do you see the lies? where do you see the vandalism? Can you say this is not the historical truth? Isn t the languange of the Tocharian people a dead language nowdays? Do red headed people as the frescos shows still live in Tarim Basin nowdays? Where do you see something not true in my saying? Or let me put it another way. You all know that the Tarim Basin is now called Turkestan by the Uighur Turks who want the cessession of this territory from China, claiming that they are the descendants of the Tocharians! I cannot see how a nation of mongollic descend and of mongollic language can be the descendant of a nation of caucausian descend and of european language! The Turks are as much invaders in the region as the Chinese are according to the Turks. I know from politics that USA are supporting the Turks, but I never thought wikipedia could be a way of passing and defending with such vigor a fictive history of the turkic Uighur nation. I always thought you were oriented towards the truth!! And Sir please the Tocharians had already suffered one genocide! Don t make them pass a second one just because they have noone to defend them, cause they are all dead! This genocide of their civilisation and history would be an even greater disaster for them than the massacres of the Huns and the Turks were