User talk:Agamakus

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to GameSpy, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Those are not reliable sources
User-generated content, including forums, wikis, etc., are not considered reliable sources. Neither are fan sites, as they are also user-created and do not typically have a reputation for fact checking or accuracy. Personal experiences are also not reliable sources, as they are Original research (OR). Please read WP:VG/RS for a list of sites that are considered reliable on video gaming-related articles.

You've also threatened to take retaliatory actions on reversions to the article. It may be a violation of the three-revert-rule, and contradicts the concept that individual editors do not have "ownership" of articles. ViperSnake151   Talk  21:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at GameSpy. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Please note that any other disruption may also result in a block. Neil N  talk to me 00:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Agamakus, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure