User talk:Agendum

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Agendum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

Heading text
=====

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence, title card, font
Thanks, Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The Mary Tyler Moore Show
 * The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence
 * Can you document the font of the first title card of the The Mary Tyler Moore Show opening sequence ?

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clapham Sect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Venn ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Clapham_Sect check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Clapham_Sect?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clapham Sect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Trinity Church ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Clapham_Sect check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Clapham_Sect?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Help, please!
I wonder whether anyone can please help. I've been archiving some of the User Talk pages on William Wilberforce and, in trying to be clever and rename some of them, I appear to have lost two pages of the really old User Talk material going right back to about 2006 or possibly earlier. Do these still exist on the server, and is it possible to reconsitute them? I'd appreciate any help you could offer! Many thanks. Cheers, Bruce Agendum (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I should add that the Contents links on the main Talk page at Talk:William_Wilberforce no longer appear to work. I'm rather concerned that these pages should be rescued, if it's at all possible to do so. Thanks in advance.
 * Bruce Agendum (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking now. I can't imagine any way that would cause the old archives to be unrecoverable, so I don't think you have anything to worry about. Perryprog (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've switched the naming convention of the archives to be numerical, as the weird date/number combination seemed to make things a bit more confusing—hopefully you're OK with this. Things seem to be OK now, but let me know if I missed anything. Perryprog (talk) 16:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much, Perryprog. That's so much better, and it's where I was rather clumsily hoping to end up. Really appreciate your help. Cheers, Bruce /Agendum (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Wilberforce's possible connection with sugar trade
For discussion of the Wilberforce family's possible connection with the sugar trade. Agendum (talk) 14:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, Bruce, but I've just read your reply on Slp1's talkpage and I don't know where to go from here. I have factual info that reflects on the Wilberforce family and may have influenced WW's early life, but I can't add it to his page on here because it's original !!! Nobody, except myself has published it; maybe nobody else has found it, or bothered to read it, or maybe they've thought it irrelevant. How can information that mentions Wilberforce, sugar and the Thornton family in the same breath not be relevant? Bryan Hamster622 (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. If you have further information I would certainly be personally interested in it, although (as I've said) it may not be relevant to the article (which is about William Wilberforce and his life and work). Do you have a reference to where you obtained this information – I think you mentioned Lambeth Archives, or somewhere like that?
 * It may be more appropriate to use the sugar trade information in the article about John Thornton, which is what I was going to suggest – now I've read more of your Hull website, it seems clear that this was definitely the same Thornton family, as the partner in that business seems to have been Samuel Watson, his father-in-law.
 * Slp1 (one of the major contributors to the Wilberforce article) has suggested that we move this discussion to the William Wilberforce talk page at Talk:William_Wilberforce – which seems a good idea (that I should have suggested in the first place). So, can we move our discussion there, please? I'm sorry to mess you about, Bryan!
 * Cheers, Bruce/ Agendum (talk) 23:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... I have atttempted to archive a further section of the talk page at Talk:William Wilberforce/Archive 5, following the instructions at [], but have apparently lost the links to previous archived pages. Can someone please help me?

Many thanks, Agendum (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks like this has been sorted. If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, all sorted! Thanks for the info, Primefac. Cheers, Agendum (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Talk:William Wilberforce and archiving
I've added back the big yellow boxes that were moved to the archive5 page for this article - they give permanently posted information about the article such as WikiProjects and article assessment and don't get moved over when everything else gets archived. Hog Farm Talk 13:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much, Hog Farm. Much appreciated. I'll try not to do it again! Cheers, Bruce / Agendum (talk) 13:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi Agendum! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

FAR for William Wilberforce
User:Buidhe has nominated William Wilberforce for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aylsham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blakeney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Done Agendum (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)