User talk:AgentFade2Black

Re: Hamilton-Wenham Regional High School...
I guess you could ask an admin to delete it for you. If so please remove the link on the Massachusetts High School Drama Guild page. -- ProveIt (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Mitt Romney
Agent,

I saw that you have edited this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney

This page is the #2 site that comes up when doing a "Mitt Romney" google. In my opinion, it is better than any other Mitt Romney article. However, it is not very comprehensive. I'm trying to make something more like a Mitt Romney book, instead of a Mitt Romney Article. The website is here:

http://myclob.pbwiki.com/

I examine many additional topics, but I want more perspectives than just my own. I would like you to help contribute, if you would like. Just e-mail me at: mike.laub@gmail.com, and I will give you the password!

Until we get more people working on it, I would like to keep the password a secret. I do not have enough time to correct graffiti.

Your VandalProof Application
Dear AgentFade2Black,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.  Daniel Bryant  05:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Input request
Hi AgentFade2Black, there is some discussion currently going on here, and I noticed you have User anime on your userpage. If you are not too busy, I would appreciate it if you could drop some of your ideas on how to reform the portal on the aforementioned talk page. Thanks!  «  A NIMUM   »  22:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Warn boxes
Feel free to use the warning boxes. Warnings can be issued by anyone on Wikipedia. Good luck, Nishkid64 (talk) 22:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Rmasbury
Thanks for the revert - looks like an IP troll has resurfaced with a new IP. Rmasbury 03:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Ah, the joys of VandalFighter. AgentFade2Black 03:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: KING-TV
The reason I removed them is that they have been removed on all other station pages per WP:NOT and NOT:TVGuide. This is at the pressure of User:JzG and User:A Man In Black. A discussion was brought up in WP:TVS and it leaned toward their removal before coming to a halt. - NeutralHomer  T:C 01:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you. AgentFade2Black 01:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You're Welcome:) - NeutralHomer  T:C 01:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

shane cubis
Have a look at the Shane Cubis article. Is it really necessary to hold this page, including his contributions to an esotoric student magazine?

I was actually asking you to look at this article. It seems to be written by Shane Cubis himself. I'm not a frequent Wikipedia user, I'm a Chaser fan, but frankly it looks like one of the writers has uploaded his Myspace page. --121.210.131.100 15:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Wrong
Wrong warning message, love.

--68.46.226.31 14:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Nikul 'Rip' Partel
I've prodded the article as a hoax. All the links on the page are spam, or newly registerd domains. Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. As you can tell by the userbox, I'm not from the UK. So I wouldn't know. AgentFade2Black 18:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Me neither (I'm from Canada). The article just looked a bit odd, and I checked out the links. Sneaky guy was trying to make it looked sourced to help keep the hoax alive. Cheers! Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, AgentFade2Black! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  Daniel  08:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning on my talk
On the article poodle. check that again... you added the "vandalism" again your edit my edit. I undid the vandalism you reinserted. daveh4h 18:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please removed this warning on my talk when you get a chance, and be careful with the templates in the future. daveh4h 18:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * My error. However, please assume good faith; it was simply an error on my part. AgentFade2Black 20:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * But I did assume good faith! check my edit summary. I've made mistakes too, there is no hard feelings, sorry if I came off that way.  and thank you for removing the warning. daveh4h 21:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Adam Terry
I believe the edits should not have been reverted, on the grounds that Adam Terry is, was and always will be a major league asshole. Goodnight. --80.193.35.196 00:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GeneralsLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GeneralsLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  03:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MHSDGLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MHSDGLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)