User talk:Agenthercules14

January 2021
Please stop removing "WWE" from the lead of articles. Thank you! JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 redux
LM2000 (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

PPV event infobox
Please stop changing the formatting, such as you did here and across all of WWE's PPV event articles. We don't need the full name of the show with the year in parenthesis. The year is enough, unless a specific event had different name. This is at least twice now that you've been reverted on this. At the very least, explain your reasoning before making these changes again. -- JDC808  ♫  06:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, you need consensus to make these widespread changes. Consider going to WT:PW to make your case. If you continue to make these changes then you will be reported.LM2000 (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I've noticed you keep changing what I've done in making the years smaller in the infobox. They were made smaller to make the infobox cleaner and tidier. I've explained this a few times in edit summaries, but you keep changing it back. You are also failing to use the edit summary to explain why you keep making these changes despite being reverted multiple times. I see you are fairly new here. If you are reverted and you make the change again, please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning. -- JDC808  ♫  11:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You are still changing things despite explanations being given, and you are still failing to use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for why you are making your changes. This is a final warning that you will be reported for your failure to communicate and continued reverting of content despite your edits being contended. -- JDC808  ♫  15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021 ANI report
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JDC808  ♫  09:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 13:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Agenthercules14. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)