User talk:Aggies14

 Hello Aggies14, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Aggies14, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 20:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Neslage
Hello Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Craig Neslage for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Staglit (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Kabacy
Hello, Aggies14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mark Kabacy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mark Kabacy to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve White (tennis)
Hello, Aggies14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Steve White (tennis), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Steve White (tennis) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Craig Neslage
Hello, Aggies14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Craig Neslage, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Craig Neslage to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cal State Fullerton Titans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steve White and Brian Quinn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Osborn (tennis coach)
Hello Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bob Osborn (tennis coach) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Bob Osborn (Tennis)

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Note-disambiguation pages are not for making biographies
Don't use the other person for that-that makes a disambiguation page which are only meant to be for links. Thanks. Wgolf (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Osborn (Tennis)


The article Bob Osborn (Tennis) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable per WP:Tennis notability guidelines for coaches

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wolbo (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ernest Becker (director of athletics)


The article Ernest Becker (director of athletics) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * What makes this athletic director noteworthy? Certainly not for tennis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brad Allen


The article Brad Allen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Etchegaray


The article Bill Etchegaray has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Osborn (Tennis)


The article Bob Osborn (Tennis) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stan Kula


The article Stan Kula has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these have been created recently... College players and coaches are not notable Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Craig Neslage


The article Craig Neslage has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these have been created... Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Kabacy


The article Mark Kabacy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these have been created... Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve White (tennis)


The article Steve White (tennis) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these have been created... Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neale R. Stoner


The article Neale R. Stoner has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these athletic persons from Cal State Fullerton have been created recently. They don't seem notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tom Ashley (tennis coach)


The article Tom Ashley (tennis coach) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A whole slew of these have been created... Not notable per Project Tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Non-notable article creation
Hi. I just wanted to encourage you to please be sure the subject of any article you are creating meets the notability guidelines for Wikipedia. In particular college athletes and coaches need to meet the standards found in WP:NCOLLATH. Quite a few articles have been created by you recently where the encyclopedic notability of the subject is doubtful. If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Craig Neslage
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Craig Neslage should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Craig Neslage.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tom Ashley (tennis coach)
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Tom Ashley (tennis coach) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Tom Ashley (tennis coach).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Mark Kabacy
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mark Kabacy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mark Kabacy.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Stan Kula
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stan Kula should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Stan Kula.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Stan Kula. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 02:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wgolf (talk) 02:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bob Osborn (Tennis)
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bob Osborn (Tennis) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bob Osborn (Tennis).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Wgolf (talk) 02:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bill Etchegaray
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bill Etchegaray should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bill Etchegaray.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Neale R. Stoner
Hello, Aggies14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Neale R. Stoner should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Neale R. Stoner.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ernest Becker (director of athletics), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Titans and CSUF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ernest Becker (athletic director) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest Becker (athletic director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ernest Becker (athletic director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion of your behavior
Hello, I just wanted to reach out to you in the hope that you actually read your user talk page(s) and might respond. I know you haven't thus far in your time on Wikipedia, and that you haven't made an attempt to communicate with your fellow editors in any way, even to the extent that you never leave edit summaries when editing articles. But I wanted to make the attempt anyway.

I am concerned with your editing. As I said before, you've made no effort to communicate with other editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, where article development, disputes, and even the rules people abide by are determined by consensus. If you are to remain active on Wikipedia, at some point you will need to communicate with other editors to avoid an escalation of conflicts.

So far your lack of communication hasn't been a serious problem, from what I can tell. The biggest problem, thus far, is your repeated attempts to remove articles for deletion tags from articles. "Articles for deletion" is an area of Wikipedia where people discuss whether or not an article should be deleted. The process is begun by a person following formal steps, and one of those steps is to leave notification on the article. Nobody is allowed to remove that notification until the discussion finishes (which usually lasts seven days, though it can last longer if there is no consensus reached in that time, or can be ended faster in rare cases). When the discussion is finished, if the article is not deleted then the administrator who closes the discussion can remove it, otherwise it must stay. Removing the tag does not stop the discussion, all it does is make it difficult to inform other editors about the discussion. I'll point out that some of the people who read that notice and then visit the discussion may argue to keep the article, so it's counter-productive to remove the tag. Also, you haven't participated at any of the articles for deletion discussions, and you are definitely welcome to do so.

Proposed deletion is a similar process to articles for deletion, except that a proposed deletion tag can be removed, and removing that tag is a way to stop the deletion. It's possible to confuse the two, but know that an articles for deletion tag says explicitly that it cannot be removed, while a proposed deletion tag tells you that you can remove the tag to protest deletion.

You repeatedly removed articles for deletion tags as Aggies14, which led to a short block of that account. You've continued that behavior recently on the Pellaman account. Please do not do that any more.

Also, on that note, you have created two accounts which is against Wikipedia policy. Unless you have a good reason to, you cannot operate more than one account on Wikipedia. When an editor creates other accounts after the first one, those extra accounts are called "sockpuppets", or sometimes "socks" for short. Having a sockpuppet that is used illegitimately is a major violation and can and does lead to being blocked. In your case, I determined that there wasn't a serious problem so far with the way you've used two accounts. You stopped using Aggies14 once you started logging in as Pellaman. Also, you waited until the block on Aggies14 expired before you created the Pellaman account, which means you did not use it to evade the block on Aggies14. So I haven't taken any action against you. But it still was not good for you to create the Pellaman account, because you did not in any way disclose that you've operated both accounts, or given any explanation as to why you did so. And, since the Aggies14 account has been blocked previously and you are continuing the same behavior that led to that block, and editing the same pages before, we cannot accept the new account as a "clean start". Also, it makes it difficult to follow your contributions (including your misbehavior) when they are divided between two different accounts that aren't obviously connected to each other.

So I would like you to decide which account you are going to use. If you only use Pellaman from this point further, that is fine. Just be sure to not ever log into Aggies14 again. If you want to use Aggies14, then let me know and I will block the Pellaman account. But either way you can only use one.

On top of all of this, I want to add a final warning. I'm giving you a chance here because you are new and I believe most of your misbehavior was due to an unfamiliarity with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. But if you continue the actions that you have been warned about before, or if I see an indication that you are misbehaving willfully, I will indefinitely block both of your accounts so that you cannot edit Wikipedia any longer. And if for some reason I do not, surely another administrator will. I am available if you have any questions, I'm willing to help you if you're having trouble at Wikipedia, but you have to ask me for help first. --  At am a  頭 22:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)