User talk:Agiseb

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Mel Gibson. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

What exactly is libelous? Everything I added has multiple sources and has been much discussed in the media. Why are the additions of the wetback and nigger allegations not considered libelous? It seems to me that sexism and domestic violence are taken less seriously than racism which I cannot understand. They are equally serious and deserve equal weight. Agiseb (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Allegation of this and that
Please allow a little trimming of the excessive content, realize it is important personally to you but it is being excessively reported in a POV way in the article. Actually it really has no place at all unless there are charges. Off2riorob (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I have no objection to a little trimming, what I don't understand is why you removed so much. The July 2 article is not a sufficient source, especially since a lot more was discussed in the press afterwards. And if there is no place for these allegations, then why are you not trying to remove the wetback and nigger allegations? It's POV to give open coverage of racism but give less weight to misogyny and domestic abuse.Agiseb (talk) 21:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Radagast 3 (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the advice. I admit I'm a bit lazy and tend not to include a summary but I usually do if it involves deleting material. I will try to fill it out in all cases.Agiseb (talk) 00:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Jim Jarmusch
Nice job on the Jim Jarmusch article, I had been meaning to add that interview but was too busy. Keep up the good work! Cheers,  Skomorokh   14:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Nikita
I just wanted to say that your editing and rewrites of the Cast section on the Nikita article are really good. Thanks so much for it. Chaos Master Chat 23:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Mia W. edit
Thought I'd clarify that the last correction you made to Mia Wasikowska was simply a copyediting error on my part and not a chronological one; no biggie. Thanks for fixing it nonetheless. sixty nine  • spill it •  21:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Sucker Punch
Thanks for that recent update with the interview in Nylon. I'm a little disturbed at the MPAA for that one and appreciate seeing the information. Good addition to the article. Millahnna (talk) 05:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)