User talk:Agneljose

Welcome!

Hello, Agneljose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Saint Theresa Church Perambur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Secret account 22:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Saint Theresa Church Perambur


The article Saint Theresa Church Perambur has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence this church meets WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 22:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Saint Joseph Shrine Panagudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright
Hi, thanks for uploading the images in commons:Category:Devasahayam Pillai. However, I'm concerned that these might be deleted, like previous images of the subject. You have asserted that you are the copyright holder. Please could you expand on this? For the source you have only said "Scan"; scan of what? If these are from a book, then you need the explicit permission of the publisher, which must be sent to WP:OTRS.

Sorry about the bureaucracy, but Wikimedia Foundation is very cautious about copyright. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Fayenatic london, I requested permission from the author, for these painting were commissioned by Roman Catholic Diocese of Kottar for the beatification ceremony of Bl. Devasagayam Pillai. I received a reply from Fr. A. Gabriel - Vice-Postulator for the cause of beatification of Devasahayam Pillai. He was kind enough to give me the following images to upload to Wikipedia too.
 * File:Martyr_Devasahayam_Pillai_Statue_Blessing_by_Cardinal_Angello_Ametho.JPG
 * File:Martyr_Devasahayam_Pillai.jpg
 * I have forwarded the email conversation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Specially the second image is what Agneljose, has scanned and edited the background, would this email be sufficient for keeping edited images too? --Jayarathina (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Good, that sounds as if you are working in the right direction. I hope Fr Gabriel did not give permission only to use the image on Wikipedia (because that does not work in legal terms), but released it either into the public domain or under a specific licence such as CC-BY-SA. Agneljose should not have stated on the file pages that he is the copyright owner, but that the image is public domain or has been published under a specific licence. If the email conversation with Fr Gabriel was not specific enough, please obtain his more specific permission to publish the images. I expect the Permissions office will give you similar advice anyway.
 * I had previously written to the Diocese myself but they did not reply to me, so I am pleased that you have at least received their co-operation! – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I did mention in my email requesting to release the images to Public Domain. But let us wait for the decision of the Permissions office --Jayarathina (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)