User talk:Agnesemiddleton

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northside Christian College has been accepted
 Northside Christian College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Northside_Christian_College help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Problems with upload of File:Logo of Northside Christian College, Everton Park, Brisbane.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Northside Christian College, Everton Park, Brisbane.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Northside Christian College
Hello Agnesemiddleton,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Northside Christian College for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 18:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Northside Christian College, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Leaving the stub as is?
I am learning this, thanks for your patience, friends. I am a little confused. I got the original message that said the page has been marked for deletion. I checked the page and it's been paired back to the original entry that was accepted as a stub. Is the stub entry marked for deletion? If so, can I ask for your consideration to not delete it and I will read up on how it can be improved? I believe that the editor who marked it for deletion removed all my edits and left the original stub article. I am trying to understand if that is the case why it's still marked for deletion? Or is it? I can't find where it says that it's marked for deletion. Thank you for your patience and great work! [(talk)AgnesemiddletonAgnesemiddleton (talk)

Disclosure of employment
Hello Agnesemiddleton. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Northside Christian College, but that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Agnesemiddleton. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Affiliation with the organisation
Hello,

Yes, I am affiliated with the organisation but am not compensated for the article. I am very happy to disclose this and would like to sincerely apologise that I haven't done it. If I disclose this on the page, will it always show up when someone views the page? If so, I am happy for the page to be deleted. Otherwise, here is the tag. I am not sure what to put in the client part as there is no direct client.

Thank you for the explanation and I will not edit it any further.


 * You can omit the 'client' field if there is none. I've corrected the one you placed on your user page. And, you don't need to place it on this page. I have removed it.
 * The disclosure notice will appear only on your user page. I will place a related tag, connected contributor (paid) on the article talk page. No one will see these tags on the main article page, since they aren't placed there.
 * You are welcome to make suggestions for edits on the article talk page, where other uninvolved editors can review your request and either make the changes or request revisions from you. You can attract the attention of other editors by placing the request edit tag on the talk page and then describing your request beneath it.
 * One last thing. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
 * Add four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.
 * This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * Thanks for your cooperation. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Cleanup for an article Northside Christian College
Hello friends,

I was wondering if I could kindly request a review of Northside Christian College page as it shows the yellow warning bar that the author of the article is closely associated with the subject. I have submitted the affiliation form to disclose this and was wondering if it is possible to remove the warning bar? Thank you kindly -

Agnesemiddleton (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Logo of Northside Christian College, Everton Park, Brisbane.png
Thank you for uploading File:Logo of Northside Christian College, Everton Park, Brisbane.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)