User talk:Agony

I disagree with the decision to blacklist deepforestmusic.com. This site has been around for over five years, and is by far the most detailed Deep Forest site available.

www.deepforestmusic.com has always been linked to on the Deep Forest wiki pages. And it was this last summer that someone began erasing the links deepforestmusic.com and replacing them with deep-projects.com

The long history of undo's was in direct response to the person from deep-projects that kept removing deepforestmusic. Deep-projects has no Deep Forest content, other than Eric Mouquet's more recent work which is not Deep Forest since it does not include Michel Sanchez. So it seems unfair to blacklist deepforestmusic when it is the person from deep-projects that has been spamming wikipedia.

Advertising
Hi. Sorry for the delay in replying to your question. The fact is that it's very difficult, sometimes, to know where to draw the line between an advertisement and an article. Even the Spam page doesn't give much guidance to those writing articles. So I looked back at your article and it was set out correctly (although with lots of errors in the English) but it concentrated very heavily on the successes of this company. It didn't say much about the history of the company. Since it is actually a marketing/advertising firm, the danger of the article appearing to be written for the purpose of soliciting contracts is that much greater than for other kinds of company. If I were to restore the article, would you be prepared to spend a lot of time addressing these issues? Deb 18:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * About common history I cannot write much more what article already had, but I found page that contain every published stock exchange announcement since 1996. Perhaps from there I can find notable history. I understand the danger, but I always try to achieve neutral point of view. If you return the article, I'm ready to try write history about Evia. --Agony-fi 06:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, done! Deb 11:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, now added brief history (with some downhills :) and requested spelling correction. --Agony-fi 12:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

"Sinut on estetty kahdeksi viikoksi toistuvan vandalismin takia. Jos tai kun esto päättyy, toivomme sinun tekevän hyödyllisiä muutoksia sotkemisen sijaan. Jos jatkat vandalismia, sinut estetään uudestaan" Miksi? Käsittääkseni kyseessä ei ole tällä kertaa muokkaussota. Onko suomenkielisellä Wikipedialla jonkinlainen lakisääteinen velvoite pitää yllä Keskustelua käyttäjistä? Tämä "sääntö" luo käsityksen että suomenkielisen Wikipedian pääasiallinen sisältö on Keskustelu Käyttäjistä :-D, ja kaikki muu mitä se pitää sisällään on häiriköitävissä, käytettävissä propagandaan tms. Lisäksi, nimimerkki "Silvonen" luulee Käyttäjän keskustelusivua artikkeliksi, mistä häntä voisi huomauttaa. Wikipedia ei ole "Vapaasti muokattava", kyseinen määrite tulisi poistaa kaikista yhteyksistä. 91.153.63.71 06:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rightware logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rightware logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)