User talk:Agswiens

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nathaniel Rich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nathaniel Rich was changed by Agswiens (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97565 on 2014-02-07T19:47:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dedovichsky District with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --   Edderso       talk          contribs  19:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peter M. Arthur, you may be blocked from editing. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 3020 in literature


A tag has been placed on 3020 in literature, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jersey92 (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)