User talk:Agucova

Thanks
I am a semi-retired WP editor (and academic) with many thousands of edits here, but no longer trust WP with my identity. Hence, I will continue, as Jimbo and other founders established as acceptable, to make my scrupulous and academic edits anonymously. Cheers, and thanks for your service to the encyclopedia. 2601:246:C700:19D:AC66:8549:25BB:12F3 (talk) 05:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I have to say, I was pretty impressed when I saw an IP quoting WP's policies in an edit summary. May I ask why you no longer trust WP with your identity? Does this have to do with the recent conflicts with the WMF? agucova (talk) 05:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi!

Jadvd (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 

No, not patrol baiting
Was a dummy edit, as they had reverted the page back after vandalising, which means that most tools refuse to revert them. So I did a dummy edit to deny them the pleasure of having the latest revision. I'm not fussed that you reverted it, since they still don't have the latest revision. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 08:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I may have laughed a bit. Seems like an honorable goal; if you want to make another dummy edit, I won't stop you! agucova (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Please
Hola, Agucova. Te quería pedir un favor: ¿Podrías checar nuevamente la redacción de la página? Muchísimas gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lectorlatinoamericano (talk • contribs) 17:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Editing of Satch
Wow, I was just about to revert that too. We almost had an edit conflict. -- Doktor Züm (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Personal attacks on WP:VPM
This is an unambiguous personal attack. After I just reminded you that reposting accusations from elsewhere without evidence violates WP:ASPERSION, you immediately proceeded to post one about me personally. Remove the first sentence and quote from that post, please. --Aquillion (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Done. agucova (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I’m not familiar with the en-wiki norms, but from the common sense, I think this was an important context to provide. If people participate in a discussion about a post that accuses a person of acting in bad faith on Wikipedia and other people of supporting this person, they should probably state the COI/being a part of the discussed accusations instead of trying to prevent this context from being known. If it violates the rules to provide the context, when a participant thinks there’s something in the direction of brigading going on, violates rules, I think this is an instance when WP:IGNORE should be remembered. A policy of hiding information away would make Wikipedia more vulnerable to groups of bad actors (regardless of whether it’s actually the case here). Though appropriate places for this kind of inquires and conflict resolution should be used. Saminmihail (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)