User talk:Aguycalledharv

May 2015
Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hazard because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Horncastle, Lincolnshire. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Horncastle, Lincolnshire was changed by Aguycalledharv (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921993 on 2015-05-15T19:08:00+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Uppingham, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Uppingham was changed by Aguycalledharv (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962055 on 2015-05-15T19:11:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 2015 Karachi bus shooting. DVdm (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exam chicken


A tag has been placed on Exam chicken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   19:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exam chicken
Hello Aguycalledharv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Exam chicken for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ChicXulub (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)