User talk:Ahamednaseefk

Ahamed Naseef Karuthedath (born 16 January 1989), known as Ahamed Naseef, is a Graphic Designer in United Arab Emirates.

Early life and education
Ahamed Naseef was born and raised in Kottakkal, Kerala. He completed his graduation in Mathematics from Calicut University, Malappuram.

Career
Ahamed Naseef started his career as a Graphic Designer in Stallion Printing Press LLC, United Arab Emirates

Dawa Light
He created a Blog Named Dawa Light, Dawa Light is an authentic source for islam, Visit www.dawalight.ml

Neerja
Hi there, I don't understand what you were trying to accomplish in this edit, so I reverted it. The name of the film is not "Neerja (film)", the name of the film is "Neerja". Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gokul Suresh
Hello, Ahamednaseefk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Gokul Suresh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Gokul Suresh to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,  Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 06:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi folks! I have expanded the article, which is clearly about a notable personality with enough sources. Cheers! Nairspecht   (talk)   (work)  07:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gokul Suresh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Hello there! I don't think you understand the basic concepts of how things are in Wikipedia. Please start reading WP:Wiki Guides.'' Nairspecht   (talk)   (work)  07:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Gokul Suresh, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Yinta n  07:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mudhugauv. Nairspecht  (talk)   (work)  07:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokul Suresh


A tag has been placed on Gokul Suresh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JackTracker (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Gokul Suresh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gokul Suresh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gokul Suresh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adulterers (film)


The article Adulterers (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, no significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Adulterers (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adulterers (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adulterers (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)