User talk:Ahamelers/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia!
- Welcome-

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AH UDelLib


A tag has been placed on User:AH UDelLib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Glaisher  [talk]  17:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it's not to advertise for my organization, but simply to declare my organizational affiliation up front. Nothing in my user page is outside the constraints in the first two bullets of WP:UPYES --AH UDelLib (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567431084 your edit] to Marquess of Ailesbury may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Brudenell-Bruce coat of arms.]|A Bookplate showing an early Brudenell-Bruce coat of arms.]


 * . --AH UDelLib (talk) 18:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dugald Stewart Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Prints and Cards


 * George Wharton Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Order of the Crown and Order of Leopold

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * . AH UDelLib (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Colored Conventions
Category:Colored Conventions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Information Professional entry
Hello AH UDelLib,

I have just edited the entry for Information Professional, by adding a lot of content, references, and a globalised view of the subject. I notice that the old article is rated as "Stub" and the importance is "Low". The article is not a stub anymore, and given the fact that the term Information Professional is an integral part of Library and Information Science (LIS) in recent years, I believe the article should have a "B" quality marking and importance set to at least "High", given that the term is now used worldwide.

Could you please advise me as to how I could go about having this article reassessed for quality within the WikiProject Libraries? If you agree with my comments, would you be able to reassess and re-mark it?

Many thanks, MargRouk (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton University Library To the Memory of John Bright.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Princeton University Library To the Memory of John Bright.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Colored Conventions articles


A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Colored Conventions articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

TJ Klune moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, TJ Klune, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)