User talk:Ahandley/sandbox

Peer review
Lead section: There is a clear and concise introductory sentence. As you expand the lead section, you may want to include a comparison of what green waste is not, and give an overview of its uses.

Structure: As you finalize your draft, make sure to include section headings to differentiate and organize your text. It looks like the current last two paragraphs could be under a section labeled 'Uses' and possibly even further divided into separate subheadings. If you divide into subheadings under a single section, you can probably add an introductory, summarizing paragraph at the beginning of this section before the subheadings.

Balance of coverage: The current usage of sources is balanced, and each topic is given an equal amount of attention. Both of these examples talked about in the draft are 'positive' uses/effects of green waste; are there possibly 'negative' uses/effects? If so, those would be good to add as well as you continue to grow the page.

Neutral content: There is a neutral tone throughout the draft. Keep it up! On another note, there are some small grammatical errors/awkward wording in the last paragraph that caught my attention. Try reading it out loud to yourself and touch up those wordings.

Reliable sources: The sources cited currently look like reliable sources, and the links work. There is good use of citing throughout the draft as well. Remember that as you finish up your draft, add wiki-links to keywords so that viewers can easily find what these words mean. There were a few keywords that I did not know, and it would have been good to quickly follow up on those links.

Great work!

Jputrasahan (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)