User talk:Aheezau

Discretionary sanctions alerts
Doug Weller talk 12:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

We don't link section headings
See MOS:LINKSTYLE. Doug Weller talk 12:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your POV on multiple BLPs of US politicians
I have lots of BLPs on my watchlist, including several US politicians. I was surprised this morning to see that a brand new account had made extensive edits to two in particular: Al Giordano and Neera Tanden, in both cases trying to tie the people in question to sex scandals. A single hit piece by a freelancer writing at HuffPo is represented by you as an "investigation by the Huffington Post."

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

HouseOfChange (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm only adding factual information using primary, credible media sources related to issues of public interest to relevant pages. I don't see what the problem is? Facts are not attacks... The Neera Tanden stuff was reported by ThinkProgress, which is wholly funded by the Center For American Progress, where the allegations and controversy occurred. It seems that your interest as a Wikipedia editor is to extinguish facts, and force honest editors into silence through bullying?

WP:BRD "Bold, revert, discuss"
One very good Wikipedia policy is WP:BRD. Please go to the talk page of the many articles to which you are trying to add new material, to get consensus from others that respects such issues as WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:UNDUE. I don't know if you are aware of the meaning of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, which others have mentioned when reverting your edits, so I am linking them here so you can check them. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Your addition to Doug Band has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 18:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ben Shapiro shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your persistent reverting on biographical articles
If you revert again at any of the biographical articles you have recently edited, such as Ben Shapiro, where you restore something that you have added before but others have removed, you are risking a block. You can avoid this outcome if you will post on the article's talk page and get consensus for your change. As you know there was a recent complaint about your edits at the ANI noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. S warm  ♠  23:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)