User talk:Ahmed91981

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ahmed91981! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Nermin Al-Fiqy -

Proposed deletion of Regininha Poltergeist


The article Regininha Poltergeist has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced advert for obscure performer

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Farajullah Salahshur


The article Farajullah Salahshur has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of German scientists


The article List of German scientists has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Uncommented and unhelpful incomplete list. If filled further, it becomes unmaintainable. In its current state, on the other hand, it is rather arbitrary and way to small to be even useful for further splitting or work. (It seems to have been created merely with the articles from the respective main category that have not yet been categorized further by field).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tikiwont (talk) 09:50, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The smae reasoning applies also to other such lists of scientists that I've proposed as well. Sorry to nominate much of your recent work, but I thinks that such crude and incomplete lists were useful in the beginning but creating them now incompletely from the top categorizes is not helping as much as you intended.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Arnold for deletion
The article Maria Arnold is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maria Arnold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Snotty Wong  spout 15:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Goddess of Love (TV Movie)
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Goddess of Love (TV Movie), may be copied from http://www.blockbuster.com/browse/catalog/movieDetails/44441. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Goddess of Love (TV Movie)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Goddess of Love (TV Movie), Ahmed91981!

Wikipedia editor Dr. Kadzi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed :)"

To reply, leave a comment on Dr. Kadzi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goddess of Love (TV Movie), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Drake and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Chinese scientists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chinese scientists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Chinese scientists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaxPprem2 (talk) 02:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Salsa (2000 film)


The article Salsa (2000 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to establish WP:NFILM. Tagged for 11 years for notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of American scientists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of American scientists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of American scientists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Broc (talk) 06:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of British scientists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British scientists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of British scientists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Broc (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of German scientists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of German scientists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of German scientists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Broc (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)