User talk:Ahmed w900i

Identity (social science)
Ahmed - you seem to be a new editor, so I'm changing my tune a bit. Apologies or leaving the warning earlier.

A couple of points about proper editing on wikipedia:
 * you need to reference statements you make to reliable publishings. for instance, you made some additions to the linked article, but neglected to specify who John Perry is, or in which publication he said the things you claim he said.  we need to know who he is so that we can discuss whether he is a reliable source; we need to know where he said what you claim he said so that we can make sure you've quoted him correctly
 * Use the article talk page to discuss issues. on the article, click the tab at the top that says 'discussion' and that will take you to the talk page.  This is particularly important if an editor undoes some of your edits - the talk page lets you talk with that editor abou why s/he did what s/he did.

I've added a quick boilerplate welcome message below, with has some helpful links. if you have any question, please feel free to ask me here or on my talk page-- Ludwigs 2 15:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

helpful edits
Thanks for your contributions to identity (social science) but your removal of material - and the additional what appears to be your own thoughts on the topic are not overly helpful. It would be great to have your further input to add to the article - but please read about some of the key principles of wikipedia, especially this one WP:RS. cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 07:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

warning notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

March 2010
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Identity (social science), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Goodvac  ( talk ) 20:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Posting material copied from an other website
You appear to be repeatedly posting material copied from http://www.123helpme.com/preview.asp?id=33073. I suggest you have a look at WP:COPYRIGHT. PhilKnight (talk) 13:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

12 hour block
for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.