User talk:Ahmednafi95

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=632686383 your edit] to Vevo Certified may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * //www.vevo.com/certified|accessdate=6 November 2014|date=6 November 2014|title=Vevo Certified}}

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Katy Perry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The One That Got Away and Wide Awake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vevo Certified, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Vevo Records


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Vevo Records. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Vevo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Vevo – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bazj (talk) 13:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vevo Records. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Enough with the Vevo list, already
The article was redirected. The consensus was to not copy this insanely detailed list into it. Stop recreating the article. Stop recreating the list.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Restoring against the AFD result and restoring a copyright violation is a very bad idea. If you do it again, your editing privileges will be blocked.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

I just saw your question: you had accidentally edited an archive of my talk page, not my talk page itself, so I didn't see it. "Why?" Well, the first reason is the reason I had nominated these articles for deletion in the first place: Vevo is just one distribution channel for videos, and it isn't our role to serve as an advertising medium for them. Second is that you are directly copying words from Vevo's website, which violates their copyright. Third is that there was a discussion about this article that lasted weeks (remember the "articles for deletion" notice that was posted at the top), and no one felt that this level of detail about Vevo was necessary.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring the above warning. Any admin can unblock when the editor agrees to stop restoring this list. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Kww(talk) 03:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)