User talk:Ahmednafiekh

Nomination of European Classic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Classic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/European Classic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valencia derby


The article Valencia derby has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no article in this state. seems abandonned

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Classic Of Baghdad


The article The Classic Of Baghdad has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no article in this state. seems abandonned

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Der Klassiker


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Der Klassiker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I noticed that you recently removed some content from German Clasico with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 17:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to German Clasico with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jamesx12345 17:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at German Clasico, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from German Clasico with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:11, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at German Clasico, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: German Clasico was changed by Ahmednafiekh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95155 on 2014-05-14T18:23:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Baghdadi Clasico
Hello, Ahmednafiekh,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Baghdadi Clasico should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Baghdadi Clasico.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Baghdadi Clasico page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615630963 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F615630963%7CBaghdadi Clasico%5D%5D Ask for help])

Real Madrid's number of titles
DOMESTIC TITLES = 32+19+9+1+1=62 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.81.251.223 (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juventus F.C.-A.C.Milan rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercontinental Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Vevo
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Vevo. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Vevo, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Vevo (second request)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Vevo. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Timmy Simons
Hi! Do you have references the appearances? Thanks. --Paolotacchi (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)